148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11309774)
1. Significance of a diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance for Papanicolaou smears in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.
Keating JT; Wang HH
Cancer; 2001 Apr; 93(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 11309774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving the performance of reflex Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) testing in triaging women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS): A restrospective study in a tertiary hospital in United Arab Emirates (UAE).
Fakhreldin M; Elmasry K
Vaccine; 2016 Feb; 34(6):823-30. PubMed ID: 26747717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Should the cytologic diagnosis of "atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance" be qualified? An assessment including comparison between conventional and liquid-based technologies.
Anton RC; Ramzy I; Schwartz MR; Younes P; Chakraborty S; Mody DR
Cancer; 2001 Apr; 93(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 11309773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Significance of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA-positive atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance pap smears in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.
Feng J; Al-Abbadi MA; Bandyopadhyay S; Salimnia H; Husain M
Acta Cytol; 2008; 52(4):434-8. PubMed ID: 18702360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Significance of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance on ThinPrep papanicolaou smears.
Eltabbakh GH; Lipman JN; Mount SL; Morgan A
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Oct; 79(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11006029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. ThinPrep Pap Test: performance and biopsy follow-up in a university hospital.
Carpenter AB; Davey DD
Cancer; 1999 Jun; 87(3):105-12. PubMed ID: 10385440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reducing or eliminating use of the category of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance decreases the diagnostic accuracy of the Papanicolaou smear.
Pitman MB; Cibas ES; Powers CN; Renshaw AA; Frable WJ
Cancer; 2002 Jun; 96(3):128-34. PubMed ID: 12115299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: a comparative review of original and automated rescreen diagnosis of cervicovaginal smears with long term follow-up.
Stastny JF; Remmers RE; London WB; Pedigo MA; Cahill LA; Ryan M; Frable WJ
Cancer; 1997 Dec; 81(6):348-53. PubMed ID: 9438460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Management of ASCUS findings in Papanicolaou smears. A retrospective study.
Iavazzo C; Boutas I; Grigoriadis C; Vrachnis N; Salakos N
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2012; 33(6):605-9. PubMed ID: 23327054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical impact of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. A cytohistologic comparison.
Lousuebsakul V; Knutsen SM; Gram IT; Akin MR
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 10667155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in postmenopausal women: a comparative retrospective analysis.
Goksedef BP; Akbayir O; Baran SY; Turan GY; Batmaz GK; Guraslan H; Corbacioglu A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Dec; 159(2):418-21. PubMed ID: 21824711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Squamous atypia in the atrophic cervical vaginal smear: a new look at an old problem.
Abati A; Jaffurs W; Wilder AM
Cancer; 1998 Aug; 84(4):218-25. PubMed ID: 9723596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increased incidence of atypical Papanicolaou tests from ThinPreps of postmenopausal women receiving hormone replacement therapy.
Menezes GA; Wakely PE; Stripe DM; Nuovo GJ
Cancer; 2001 Dec; 93(6):357-63. PubMed ID: 11748575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude a high-grade intraepithelial lesion and its clinical significance in postmenopausal, pregnant, postpartum, and contraceptive-use patients.
Patton AL; Duncan L; Bloom L; Phaneuf G; Zafar N
Cancer; 2008 Dec; 114(6):481-8. PubMed ID: 18980288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ASCUS on cervical cytologic smears. Clinical significance.
Yang M; Zachariah S
J Reprod Med; 1997 Jun; 42(6):329-31. PubMed ID: 9219118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Papanicolaou tests diagnosed as atypical by a cytotechnologist and downgraded to benign by a pathologist: a measure of laboratory quality.
Condel JL; Mahood LK; Grzybicki DM; Sturgis CD; Raab SS
Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Apr; 117(4):534-40. PubMed ID: 11939726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [ASCUS in screening].
Caprara L; Monari F; De Bianchi PS; Amadori A; Bondi A
Pathologica; 2001 Dec; 93(6):645-50. PubMed ID: 11785115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cytologic predictors of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with an ASCUS Pap smear.
Morin C; Bairati I; Bouchard C; Fortier M; Roy M; Moore L; Meisels A
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(4):576-86. PubMed ID: 10934951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Should atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) be subcategorized? Accuracy analysis of Papanicolaou smears using receiver operating characteristic curves and implications for the ASCUS/squamous intraepithelial lesion ratio.
Renshaw AA; Genest DR; Cibas ES
Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Nov; 116(5):692-5. PubMed ID: 11710685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Qualifiers of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance help in patient management.
Collins LC; Wang HH; Abu-Jawdeh GM
Mod Pathol; 1996 Jun; 9(6):677-81. PubMed ID: 8782207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
