BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11309774)

  • 21. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in women over 55. Comparison with the general population and implications for management.
    Rader AE; Rose PG; Rodriguez M; Mansbacher S; Pitlik D; Abdul-Karim FW
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 10349362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reducing "atypical squamous cells" overdiagnosis on cervicovaginal smears by diligent cytology screening.
    Gupta S; Sodhani P
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Sep; 40(9):764-9. PubMed ID: 21309012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Postmenopausal Squamous Atypia: Cytologic Features, Hybrid Capture 2 Tests and Contribution to the ASCUS Pool.
    McHugh KE; Reynolds JP; Suarez AA
    Acta Cytol; 2018; 62(5-6):418-422. PubMed ID: 30045008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Diagnosis and survey of abnormal/atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: a retrospective study.
    Giudice A; Rizzo M; Rossi RT; Bonaffini O; Buda CA; Pettineo G
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(2B):1195-9. PubMed ID: 10810421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. ASCUS, mature metaplastic type. Cytologic diagnosis and follow-up.
    Gupta D; Kannan V; Komaromy-Hiller G; Kline TS
    Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 11284305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Eliminating the diagnosis atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: impact on the accuracy of the Papanicolaou test.
    Sodhani P; Gupta S; Singh V; Sehgal A; Mitra AB
    Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(6):783-7. PubMed ID: 15581162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: interlaboratory comparison and quality assurance monitors.
    Davey DD; Naryshkin S; Nielsen ML; Kline TS
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1994 Dec; 11(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 7895579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Qualification of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in an independent laboratory: is it useful or significant?
    Lachman MF; Cavallo-Calvanese C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Aug; 179(2):421-9. PubMed ID: 9731848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical evaluation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance on cervical cytology.
    Duska LR; Flynn CF; Chen A; Whall-Strojwas D; Goodman A
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Feb; 91(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 9469289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
    Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical significance of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance in postmenopausal women.
    Chhieng DC; Elgert P; Cohen JM; Cangiarella JF
    Cancer; 2001 Feb; 93(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 11241259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is colposcopic biopsy overused among women with a cytological diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS)?
    Lousuebsakul V; Knutsen SM; Singh PN; Gram IT
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2003; 12(6):553-9. PubMed ID: 13678510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Follow-up of Papanicolaou smears diagnosed as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
    Howell LP; Davis RL
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1996 Feb; 14(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 8834072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. ASCUS: comparative follow-up results related to previous SIL diagnosis.
    Alameda F; Fuste P; Conangla M; Gimferrer E; Soler I; Antorn MT; Persico S; Carreras R; Serrano S
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2000; 21(1):81-3. PubMed ID: 10726627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Rare atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS): a clinically significant diagnosis?
    Hoerl HD; Roth-Cline MD; Shalkham JE; Pfister J; Stewart J; Guo Z; De Las Casas LE; Caya JG; Kurtycz DF
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Jul; 27(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 12112807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: lessons learned from human Papillomavirus DNA testing.
    Johnston EI; Logani S
    Cancer; 2007 Jun; 111(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 17506090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Enlarged squamous cell nuclei in cervical cytologic specimens from perimenopausal women ("PM Cells") : a cause of ASC overdiagnosis.
    Cibas ES; Browne TJ; Bassichis MH; Lee KR
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Jul; 124(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 15923175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Long-term follow-up of women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS).
    Emerson RE; Puzanov A; Brunnemer C; Younger C; Cramer H
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2002 Sep; 27(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 12203862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical significance of cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells, cannot exclude high grade, in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.
    Saad RS; Dabbs DJ; Kordunsky L; Kanbour-Shakir A; Silverman JF; Liu Y; Kanbour A
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Sep; 126(3):381-8. PubMed ID: 16880134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The significance of atypical glandular cells on routine cervical cytologic testing in a community-based population.
    Chin AB; Bristow RE; Korst LM; Walts A; Lagasse LD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1278-82. PubMed ID: 10871439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.