These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11310317)

  • 1. Retention of water-borne bacteria by membrane filters. Part III: Bacterial challenge tests on 0.1 micron rated filters.
    Sundaram S; Eisenhuth J; Howard G; Brandwein H
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2001; 55(2):114-26. PubMed ID: 11310317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Method for qualifying microbial removal performance of 0.1 micron rated filters. Part III: bacterial challenge tests on 0.2/0.22 and 0.1 micron rated filter cartridges with Hydrogenophaga (formerly Pseudomonas) pseudoflava.
    Sundaram S; Eisenhuth J; Lewis M; Howard G; Brandwein H
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2001; 55(6):393-416. PubMed ID: 11766824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retention of water-borne bacteria by membrane filters. Part II: Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) characterization of bacterial species recovered downstream of 0.2/0.22 micron rated filters.
    Sundaram S; Mallick S; Eisenhuth J; Howard G; Brandwein H
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2001; 55(2):87-113. PubMed ID: 11310323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Method for qualifying microbial removal performance of 0.1 micron rated filters. Part I: characterization of water isolates for potential use as standard challenge organisms to qualify 0.1 micron rated filters.
    Sundaram S; Eisenhuth J; Howard G; Brandwein H
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2001; 55(6):346-72. PubMed ID: 11766822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Method for qualifying microbial removal performance of 0.1 micron rated filters. Part II: preliminary characterization of Hydrogenophaga (formerly Pseudomonas) pseudoflava for use as a standard challenge organism to qualify 0.1 micron rated filters.
    Sundaram S; Eisenhuth J; Steves M; Howard G; Brandwein H
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2001; 55(6):373-92. PubMed ID: 11766823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of membrane filtration for removal of diminutive bioburden organisms in pharmaceutical products and processes.
    Sundaram S; Auriemma M; Howard G; Brandwein H; Leo F
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 1999; 53(4):186-201. PubMed ID: 10754712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Method for qualifying microbial removal performance of 0.1 micron rated filters. Part IV: Retention of hydrogenophaga pseudoflava (ATCC 700892) and Ralstonia pickettii (ATCC 700591) by 0.2 and 0.22 micron rated filters.
    Sundaram S; Lewis M; Eisenhuth J; Howard G; Larson B
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2002; 56(3):150-71. PubMed ID: 12109335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retention of water-borne bacteria by membrane filters. Part I: Bacterial challenge tests on 0.2 and 0.22 micron rated filters.
    Sundaram S; Eisenhuth J; Howard G; Brandwein H
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2001; 55(2):65-86. PubMed ID: 11310322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Importance of Accurate Microorganism Identification in Microbial Challenge Tests of Membrane Filters. Part II. The Comparison of Hydrogenophaga pseudoflava ATTC 33668 and Curvibacter sp. ATCC 700892 by Microbial Challenge Tests with Membrane Filters.
    Haake G; Kaesler-Neumann I; Hennig H; Meltzer TH; Jornitz MW
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2012; 66(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 22767883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the Effect of the Volume Throughput and Maximum Flux of Low-Surface-Tension Fluids on Bacterial Penetration of 0.2 Micron-Rated Filters during Process-Specific Filter Validation Testing.
    Folmsbee M
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2015; 69(2):307-16. PubMed ID: 25868996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sterilizing filtration of liposome and related lipid-containing solutions: enhancing successful filter qualification.
    Folmsbee M; Moussourakis M
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2012; 66(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 22492601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Development of a Microbial Challenge Test with Acholeplasma laidlawii To Rate Mycoplasma-Retentive Filters by Filter Manufacturers.
    Folmsbee M; Lentine KR; Wright C; Haake G; Mcburnie L; Ashtekar D; Beck B; Hutchison N; Okhio-Seaman L; Potts B; Pawar V; Windsor H
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2014; 68(3):281-96. PubMed ID: 25188349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of recovery filters for use in bacterial retention testing of sterilizing-grade filters.
    Carter J
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 1996; 50(3):147-53. PubMed ID: 8696777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The importance of accurate microorganism identification in microbial challenge tests of membrane filters--part I.
    Kaesler I; Haake G; Hennig H; Rosenhagen A; Meltzer TH; Jornitz MW
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2011; 65(2):92-9. PubMed ID: 21502070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changes in the cell size of Brevundimonas diminuta using different growth agitation rates.
    Lee SH; Lee SS; Kim CW
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2002; 56(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 11977409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of serum-free media for the cultivation and recovery of Acholeplasma laidlawii used for challenge testing sterilizing-grade filters in biopharmaceutical applications.
    Bates S; Nguyen N; Lentine KR
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2008; 62(6):402-20. PubMed ID: 19634344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experimental comparison of point-of-use filters for drinking water ultrafiltration.
    Totaro M; Valentini P; Casini B; Miccoli M; Costa AL; Baggiani A
    J Hosp Infect; 2017 Jun; 96(2):172-176. PubMed ID: 28073586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Practical methods for the microbial validation of sterilizing-grade filters used in aseptic processing.
    MacDonald WD; Pelletier CA; Gasper DL
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1989; 43(6):266-70. PubMed ID: 2689620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of Hydrogenophaga pseudoflava penetration to quantitatively assess the impact of filtration parameters for 0.2-micrometer-pore-size filters.
    Lee A; McVey J; Faustino P; Lute S; Sweeney N; Pawar V; Khan M; Brorson K; Hussong D
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2010 Feb; 76(3):695-700. PubMed ID: 19966023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microbial retention characteristics of 0.2-microns-rated nylon membrane filters during filtration of high viscosity fluids at high differential pressure and varied temperatures.
    Aranha H; Meeker J
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 1995; 49(2):67-70. PubMed ID: 7780747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.