These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11310512)

  • 1. Post hoc power analysis: an idea whose time has passed?
    Levine M; Ensom MH
    Pharmacotherapy; 2001 Apr; 21(4):405-9. PubMed ID: 11310512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Negative results of randomized clinical trials published in the surgical literature: equivalency or error?
    Dimick JB; Diener-West M; Lipsett PA
    Arch Surg; 2001 Jul; 136(7):796-800. PubMed ID: 11448393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pitfalls in reporting sample size calculation in randomized controlled trials published in leading anaesthesia journals: a systematic review.
    Abdulatif M; Mukhtar A; Obayah G
    Br J Anaesth; 2015 Nov; 115(5):699-707. PubMed ID: 26041717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sample size calculations in randomized trials: common pitfalls.
    Brasher PM; Brant RF
    Can J Anaesth; 2007 Feb; 54(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 17272248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sample size and statistical power of randomised, controlled trials in orthopaedics.
    Freedman KB; Back S; Bernstein J
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2001 Apr; 83(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 11341427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized controlled trials in otolaryngology journals.
    Yao F; Singer M; Rosenfeld RM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Oct; 137(4):539-44. PubMed ID: 17903567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sample size considerations for superiority trials in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
    Moore AD; Joseph L
    Lupus; 1999; 8(8):612-9. PubMed ID: 10568897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trend in randomized controlled trials.
    Băicuş C
    Rom J Intern Med; 2003; 41(3):329-32. PubMed ID: 15526517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Safety reporting in randomized clinical trials - a need for improvement.
    Yazici Y
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):209-10. PubMed ID: 19583556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical power of negative randomized controlled trials presented at American Society for Clinical Oncology annual meetings.
    Bedard PL; Krzyzanowska MK; Pintilie M; Tannock IF
    J Clin Oncol; 2007 Aug; 25(23):3482-7. PubMed ID: 17687153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sample size calculations for pilot randomized trials: a confidence interval approach.
    Cocks K; Torgerson DJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Feb; 66(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 23195919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The quality of reporting of randomized trials in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery from 1988 through 2000.
    Bhandari M; Richards RR; Sprague S; Schemitsch EH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Mar; 84(3):388-96. PubMed ID: 11886908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Negative studies published in medical journals of India do not give sufficient information regarding power/sample size calculation and confidence interval.
    ; Saxena D; Yadav P; Kantharia ND
    J Postgrad Med; 2011; 57(2):176-7. PubMed ID: 21654149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in community-based cluster randomization trials with a binary outcome.
    Braschel MC; Svec I; Darlington GA; Donner A
    Clin Trials; 2016 Apr; 13(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 26415500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Post hoc power calculations.
    Wallace DK; Melia M
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Nov; 115(11):2098; author reply 2098-9. PubMed ID: 19068383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sample size in orthodontic randomized controlled trials: are numbers justified?
    Koletsi D; Pandis N; Fleming PS
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Feb; 36(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 23460731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Learning from past mistakes: assessing trial quality, power and eligibility in non-renal systemic lupus erythematosus randomized controlled trials.
    Yuen SY; Pope JE
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2008 Sep; 47(9):1367-72. PubMed ID: 18577549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. GDNF in Parkinson's disease: the perils of post-hoc power.
    Matcham J; McDermott MP; Lang AE
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Jul; 163(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 17540454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are we satisfied with the way we review an article?
    Aslam M; Burris HH; Zupancic JA
    Adv Neonatal Care; 2009 Feb; 9(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 19212165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample size of surgical randomized controlled trials: a lack of improvement over time.
    Ahmed Ali U; Ten Hove JR; Reiber BM; van der Sluis PC; Besselink MG
    J Surg Res; 2018 Aug; 228():1-7. PubMed ID: 29907196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.