These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11310536)

  • 1. Optimal setups for forced-choice staircases with fixed step sizes.
    García-Pérez MA
    Spat Vis; 2000; 13(4):431-48. PubMed ID: 11310536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forced-choice staircases with fixed step sizes: asymptotic and small-sample properties.
    García-Pérez MA
    Vision Res; 1998 Jun; 38(12):1861-81. PubMed ID: 9797963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Yes-no staircases with fixed step sizes: psychometric properties and optimal setup.
    García-Pérez MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2001 Jan; 78(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 11233336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of fixed-step-size and Bayesian staircases for sensory threshold estimation.
    Alcalá-Quintana R; García-Pérez MA
    Spat Vis; 2007; 20(3):197-218. PubMed ID: 17524255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Properties of some variants of adaptive staircases with fixed step sizes.
    García-Pérez MA
    Spat Vis; 2002; 15(3):303-21. PubMed ID: 12116992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A cautionary note on the use of the adaptive up-down method.
    García-Pérez MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2098-107. PubMed ID: 21973364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Small-sample characterization of stochastic approximation staircases in forced-choice adaptive threshold estimation.
    Faes L; Nollo G; Ravelli F; Ricci L; Vescovi M; Turatto M; Pavani F; Antolini R
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Feb; 69(2):254-62. PubMed ID: 17557595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the performance of the staircase and quick Change Detection methods in measuring perceptual learning.
    Zhang P; Zhao Y; Dosher BA; Lu ZL
    J Vis; 2019 Jul; 19(7):14. PubMed ID: 31323664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determining thresholds using adaptive procedures and psychometric fits: evaluating efficiency using theory, simulations, and human experiments.
    Karmali F; Chaudhuri SE; Yi Y; Merfeld DM
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):773-89. PubMed ID: 26645306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptive psychophysical procedures and imbalance in the psychometric function.
    Saberi K; Green DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jul; 100(1):528-36. PubMed ID: 8675846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficient estimation of stereo thresholds: What slope should be assumed for the psychometric function?
    Serrano-Pedraza I; Vancleef K; Herbert W; Goodship N; Woodhouse M; Read JCA
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0226822. PubMed ID: 31895925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation.
    King-Smith PE; Grigsby SS; Vingrys AJ; Benes SC; Supowit A
    Vision Res; 1994 Apr; 34(7):885-912. PubMed ID: 8160402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Properties of staircase procedures for estimating thresholds in automated perimetry.
    Johnson CA; Chauhan BC; Shapiro LR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 Sep; 33(10):2966-74. PubMed ID: 1526745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sampling plans for fitting the psychometric function.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Span J Psychol; 2005 Nov; 8(2):256-89. PubMed ID: 16255393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-, three-, and four-interval forced-choice staircase procedures: estimator bias and efficiency.
    Schlauch RS; Rose RM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):732-40. PubMed ID: 2212297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: a commentary.
    Klein SA
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Nov; 63(8):1421-55. PubMed ID: 11800466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attentional modulation of a figural aftereffect.
    Shulman GL
    Perception; 1992; 21(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 1528706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The perception of visual ambiguous figures in schizophrenia and Parkinson's disease.
    Calvert JE; Harris JP; Phillipson OT; Babiker IE; Ford MF; Antebi DL
    Int Clin Psychopharmacol; 1988 Apr; 3(2):131-50. PubMed ID: 3397521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [DIN-compatible vision assessment of increased reproducibility using staircase measurement and maximum likelihood analysis].
    Weigmann U; Petersen J
    Ophthalmologe; 1996 Aug; 93(4):328-32. PubMed ID: 8963126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of adaptive psychometric procedures motivated by the theory of optimal experiments: simulated and experimental results.
    Remus JJ; Collins LM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):315-26. PubMed ID: 18177161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.