152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11310783)
1. Spatial filter approach for comparison of the forward and inverse problems of electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography.
Bradshaw LA; Wijesinghe RS; Wikswo JP
Ann Biomed Eng; 2001 Mar; 29(3):214-26. PubMed ID: 11310783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spatial filter approach for evaluation of the surface Laplacian of the electroencephalogram and magnetoencephalogram.
Bradshaw LA; Wikswo JP
Ann Biomed Eng; 2001 Mar; 29(3):202-13. PubMed ID: 11310782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods.
Mosher JC; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Mar; 46(3):245-59. PubMed ID: 10097460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Linear inverse source estimate of combined EEG and MEG data related to voluntary movements.
Babiloni F; Carducci F; Cincotti F; Del Gratta C; Pizzella V; Romani GL; Rossini PM; Tecchio F; Babiloni C
Hum Brain Mapp; 2001 Dec; 14(4):197-209. PubMed ID: 11668651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The magnetic field of cortical current sources: the application of a spatial filtering model to the forward and inverse problems.
Tan S; Roth BJ; Wikswo JP
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990 Jul; 76(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 1694487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram.
Cuffin BN; Cohen D
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1979 Aug; 47(2):132-46. PubMed ID: 95707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
Engemann DA; Gramfort A
Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A multiresolution framework to MEG/EEG source imaging.
Gavit L; Baillet S; Mangin JF; Pescatore J; Garnero L
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 Oct; 48(10):1080-7. PubMed ID: 11585031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mapping the signal-to-noise-ratios of cortical sources in magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.
Goldenholz DM; Ahlfors SP; Hämäläinen MS; Sharon D; Ishitobi M; Vaina LM; Stufflebeam SM
Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 Apr; 30(4):1077-86. PubMed ID: 18465745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A methodological framework for inverse-modeling of propagating cortical activity using MEG/EEG.
Hindriks R
Neuroimage; 2020 Dec; 223():117345. PubMed ID: 32896634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dipole models for the EEG and MEG.
Schimpf PH; Ramon C; Haueisen J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 May; 49(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 12002172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling.
Wolters CH; Anwander A; Tricoche X; Weinstein D; Koch MA; MacLeod RS
Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel integrated MEG and EEG analysis method for dipolar sources.
Huang MX; Song T; Hagler DJ; Podgorny I; Jousmaki V; Cui L; Gaa K; Harrington DL; Dale AM; Lee RR; Elman J; Halgren E
Neuroimage; 2007 Sep; 37(3):731-48. PubMed ID: 17658272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Volume conductor effects on the spatial resolution of magnetic fields and electric potentials from gastrointestinal electrical activity.
Bradshaw LA; Richards WO; Wikswo JP
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2001 Jan; 39(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 11214271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimum-norm cortical source estimation in layered head models is robust against skull conductivity error.
Stenroos M; Hauk O
Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 81():265-272. PubMed ID: 23639259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spatial sampling of MEG and EEG based on generalized spatial-frequency analysis and optimal design.
Iivanainen J; Mäkinen AJ; Zetter R; Stenroos M; Ilmoniemi RJ; Parkkonen L
Neuroimage; 2021 Dec; 245():118747. PubMed ID: 34852277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cortical dipole imaging of movement-related potentials by means of parametric inverse filters incorporating with signal and noise covariance.
Hori J; Miwa T; Ohshima T; He B
Methods Inf Med; 2007; 46(2):242-6. PubMed ID: 17347764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
