These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11311040)

  • 1. The influence of viewing eye on pseudoneglect magnitude.
    McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M; Butler J
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2001 Mar; 7(3):391-5. PubMed ID: 11311040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of unimanual response on pseudoneglect magnitude.
    McCourt ME; Freeman P; Tahmahkera-Stevens C; Chaussee M
    Brain Cogn; 2001 Feb; 45(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 11161362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect: influence of line geometry.
    McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(4):520-4. PubMed ID: 10683402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Asymmetries of visuospatial attention are modulated by viewing distance and visual field elevation: pseudoneglect in peripersonal and extrapersonal space.
    McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M
    Cortex; 2000 Dec; 36(5):715-31. PubMed ID: 11195917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cognitive and perceptual influences on visual line bisection: psychophysical and chronometric analyses of pseudoneglect.
    McCourt ME; Olafson C
    Neuropsychologia; 1997 Mar; 35(3):369-80. PubMed ID: 9051685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Centripetal versus centrifugal bias in visual line bisection: focusing attention on two hypotheses.
    McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M; Slater J
    Front Biosci; 2000 Jan; 5():D58-71. PubMed ID: 10702377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biases of spatial attention in vision and audition.
    Sosa Y; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; McCourt ME
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 20566234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks.
    Jewell G; McCourt ME
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(1):93-110. PubMed ID: 10617294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of acute ethanol challenge on global visuospatial attention: exaggeration of leftward bias in line bisection.
    Leone L; McCourt ME
    Laterality; 2010 May; 15(3):327-42. PubMed ID: 19319748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance consistency of normal observers in forced-choice tachistoscopic visual line bisection.
    McCourt ME
    Neuropsychologia; 2001; 39(10):1065-76. PubMed ID: 11440759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect.
    McCourt ME; Jewell G
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(7):843-55. PubMed ID: 10408651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unilateral visual cueing and asymmetric line geometry share a common attentional origin in the modulation of pseudoneglect.
    McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M; Reuter-Lorenz PA
    Cortex; 2005 Aug; 41(4):499-511. PubMed ID: 16042026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eye dominance modulates visuospatial attention.
    Schintu S; Chaumillon R; Guillaume A; Salemme R; Reilly KT; Pisella L; Farnè A
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Apr; 141():107314. PubMed ID: 31870684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bisection of shapes and lines: analysis of the visual and motor aspects of pseudoneglect.
    Macdonald-Nethercott EM; Kinnear PR; Venneri A
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Aug; 91(1):217-26. PubMed ID: 11011891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Putts that get missed on the right: investigating lateralized attentional biases and the nature of putting errors in golf.
    Roberts R; Turnbull OH
    J Sports Sci; 2010 Feb; 28(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 20155570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissociations in rod bisection: the effect of viewing conditions on perception and action.
    Hughes LE; Bates TC; Aimola Davies AM
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1279-87. PubMed ID: 18761142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stable individual differences predict eye movements to the left, but not handedness or line bisection.
    Foulsham T; Frost E; Sage L
    Vision Res; 2018 Mar; 144():38-46. PubMed ID: 29499212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of baseline directional differences in pseudoneglect on distractibility.
    Thomas NA; Aniulis E; Nicholls MER
    Cortex; 2016 Apr; 77():69-83. PubMed ID: 26922505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Signatures of functional visuospatial asymmetries in early infancy.
    Nava E; de Hevia MD; Bulf H; Macchi Cassia V
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2022 Mar; 215():105326. PubMed ID: 34883319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hemispheric dominance for visuospatial attention does not predict the direction of pseudoneglect.
    Gerrits R; Verhelst H; Vingerhoets G
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Nov; 148():107634. PubMed ID: 32998020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.