118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11311040)
1. The influence of viewing eye on pseudoneglect magnitude.
McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M; Butler J
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2001 Mar; 7(3):391-5. PubMed ID: 11311040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of unimanual response on pseudoneglect magnitude.
McCourt ME; Freeman P; Tahmahkera-Stevens C; Chaussee M
Brain Cogn; 2001 Feb; 45(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 11161362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect: influence of line geometry.
McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M
Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(4):520-4. PubMed ID: 10683402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Asymmetries of visuospatial attention are modulated by viewing distance and visual field elevation: pseudoneglect in peripersonal and extrapersonal space.
McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M
Cortex; 2000 Dec; 36(5):715-31. PubMed ID: 11195917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cognitive and perceptual influences on visual line bisection: psychophysical and chronometric analyses of pseudoneglect.
McCourt ME; Olafson C
Neuropsychologia; 1997 Mar; 35(3):369-80. PubMed ID: 9051685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Centripetal versus centrifugal bias in visual line bisection: focusing attention on two hypotheses.
McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M; Slater J
Front Biosci; 2000 Jan; 5():D58-71. PubMed ID: 10702377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biases of spatial attention in vision and audition.
Sosa Y; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; McCourt ME
Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 20566234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks.
Jewell G; McCourt ME
Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(1):93-110. PubMed ID: 10617294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of acute ethanol challenge on global visuospatial attention: exaggeration of leftward bias in line bisection.
Leone L; McCourt ME
Laterality; 2010 May; 15(3):327-42. PubMed ID: 19319748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance consistency of normal observers in forced-choice tachistoscopic visual line bisection.
McCourt ME
Neuropsychologia; 2001; 39(10):1065-76. PubMed ID: 11440759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visuospatial attention in line bisection: stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect.
McCourt ME; Jewell G
Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(7):843-55. PubMed ID: 10408651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Unilateral visual cueing and asymmetric line geometry share a common attentional origin in the modulation of pseudoneglect.
McCourt ME; Garlinghouse M; Reuter-Lorenz PA
Cortex; 2005 Aug; 41(4):499-511. PubMed ID: 16042026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Eye dominance modulates visuospatial attention.
Schintu S; Chaumillon R; Guillaume A; Salemme R; Reilly KT; Pisella L; Farnè A
Neuropsychologia; 2020 Apr; 141():107314. PubMed ID: 31870684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bisection of shapes and lines: analysis of the visual and motor aspects of pseudoneglect.
Macdonald-Nethercott EM; Kinnear PR; Venneri A
Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Aug; 91(1):217-26. PubMed ID: 11011891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Putts that get missed on the right: investigating lateralized attentional biases and the nature of putting errors in golf.
Roberts R; Turnbull OH
J Sports Sci; 2010 Feb; 28(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 20155570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dissociations in rod bisection: the effect of viewing conditions on perception and action.
Hughes LE; Bates TC; Aimola Davies AM
Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1279-87. PubMed ID: 18761142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stable individual differences predict eye movements to the left, but not handedness or line bisection.
Foulsham T; Frost E; Sage L
Vision Res; 2018 Mar; 144():38-46. PubMed ID: 29499212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of baseline directional differences in pseudoneglect on distractibility.
Thomas NA; Aniulis E; Nicholls MER
Cortex; 2016 Apr; 77():69-83. PubMed ID: 26922505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Signatures of functional visuospatial asymmetries in early infancy.
Nava E; de Hevia MD; Bulf H; Macchi Cassia V
J Exp Child Psychol; 2022 Mar; 215():105326. PubMed ID: 34883319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hemispheric dominance for visuospatial attention does not predict the direction of pseudoneglect.
Gerrits R; Verhelst H; Vingerhoets G
Neuropsychologia; 2020 Nov; 148():107634. PubMed ID: 32998020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
