These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Searching for pharmacophoric patterns in databases of three-dimensional chemical structures. Willett P J Mol Recognit; 1995; 8(5):290-303. PubMed ID: 8619950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Median Partitioning: a novel method for the selection of representative subsets from large compound pools. Godden JW; Xue L; Kitchen DB; Stahura FL; Schermerhorn EJ; Bajorath J J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2002; 42(4):885-93. PubMed ID: 12132890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Application of kernel functions for accurate similarity search in large chemical databases. Wang X; Huan J; Smalter A; Lushington GH BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Apr; 11 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S8. PubMed ID: 20438655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Similarity searching in files of three-dimensional chemical structures: representation and searching of molecular electrostatic potentials using field-graphs. Thorner DA; Willett P; Wright PM; Taylor R J Comput Aided Mol Des; 1997 Mar; 11(2):163-74. PubMed ID: 9089434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effective protocol for database similarity searching of heteronuclear single quantum coherence spectra. Pierens GK; Mobli M; Vegh V Anal Chem; 2009 Nov; 81(22):9329-35. PubMed ID: 19856946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Compressed Feature Matrix--a novel descriptor for adaptive similarity search. Abolmaali SF; Ostermann C; Zell A J Mol Model; 2003 Feb; 9(1):66-75. PubMed ID: 12638013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Mapping algorithms for molecular similarity analysis and ligand-based virtual screening: design of DynaMAD and comparison with MAD and DMC. Eckert H; Vogt I; Bajorath J J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(4):1623-34. PubMed ID: 16859294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. "Bayes affinity fingerprints" improve retrieval rates in virtual screening and define orthogonal bioactivity space: when are multitarget drugs a feasible concept? Bender A; Jenkins JL; Glick M; Deng Z; Nettles JH; Davies JW J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2445-56. PubMed ID: 17125186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A structural hierarchy matching approach for molecular similarity/substructure searching. Ji SS; Dong HJ; Zhou XX; Liu YM; Zhang FX; Wang Q; Huang XA Molecules; 2015 May; 20(5):8791-9. PubMed ID: 25988610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Descriptor collision and confusion: toward the design of descriptors to mask chemical structures. Bologa C; Allu TK; Olah M; Kappler MA; Oprea TI J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2005; 19(9-10):625-35. PubMed ID: 16322910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Pharmacophoric pattern matching in files of three-dimensional chemical structures: use of bounded distance matrices for the representation and searching of conformationally flexible molecules. Clark DE; Willett P; Kenny PW J Mol Graph; 1992 Dec; 10(4):194-204. PubMed ID: 1476991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. An efficient projection protocol for chemical databases: singular value decomposition combined with truncated-newton minimization. Xie D; Tropsha A; Schlick T J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2000; 40(1):167-77. PubMed ID: 10661564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. FLASHFLOOD: a 3D field-based similarity search and alignment method for flexible molecules. Pitman MC; Huber WK; Horn H; Krämer A; Rice JE; Swope WC J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2001 Jul; 15(7):587-612. PubMed ID: 11688943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Use of Markush structure analysis techniques for descriptor generation and clustering of large combinatorial libraries. Barnard JM; Downs GM; von Scholley-Pfab A; Brown RD J Mol Graph Model; 2000; 18(4-5):452-63. PubMed ID: 11143562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Partitioning methods for the identification of active molecules. Stahura FL; Bajorath J Curr Med Chem; 2003 Apr; 10(8):707-15. PubMed ID: 12678788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Performance of similarity measures in 2D fragment-based similarity searching: comparison of structural descriptors and similarity coefficients. Chen X; Reynolds CH J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2002; 42(6):1407-14. PubMed ID: 12444738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. How diverse are diversity assessment methods? A comparative analysis and benchmarking of molecular descriptor space. Koutsoukas A; Paricharak S; Galloway WR; Spring DR; Ijzerman AP; Glen RC; Marcus D; Bender A J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan; 54(1):230-42. PubMed ID: 24289493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Molecular Descriptors for Structure-Activity Applications: A Hands-On Approach. Grisoni F; Ballabio D; Todeschini R; Consonni V Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1800():3-53. PubMed ID: 29934886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Similarity measures for rational set selection and analysis of combinatorial libraries: the Diverse Property-Derived (DPD) approach. Lewis RA; Mason JS; McLay IM J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 1997; 37(3):599-614. PubMed ID: 9177003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]