These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11313729)

  • 1. Evaluation of a new digital panoramic system: a comparison with film.
    Ramesh A; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Mar; 30(2):98-100. PubMed ID: 11313729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of dose reduction on the detection of anatomical structures on panoramic radiographs.
    Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 16798925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two- and three-dimensional imaging modalities for the detection of caries. A comparison between film, digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
    Abreu Júnior M; Tyndall DA; Platin E; Ludlow JB; Phillips C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 10740469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ex vivo evaluation of new 2D and 3D dental radiographic technology for detecting caries.
    Gaalaas L; Tyndall D; Mol A; Everett ET; Bangdiwala A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(3):20150281. PubMed ID: 26670605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extraoral radiographic imaging of primary caries.
    Clifton TL; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jul; 27(4):193-8. PubMed ID: 9780894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of extraoral tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT) for proximal caries detection.
    Harase Y; Araki K; Okano T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):791-6. PubMed ID: 16731402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11803388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition.
    Uprichard KK; Potter BJ; Russell CM; Schafer TE; Adair S; Weller RN
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10730280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of dose reduction in digital dental panoramic radiography on image quality.
    Dannewitz B; Hassfeld S; Eickholz P; Mühling J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 11803389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiographic detection of approximal caries: a comparison of dental films and digital imaging systems.
    Syriopoulos K; Sanderink GC; Velders XL; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):312-8. PubMed ID: 10980568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth.
    Akarslan ZZ; Akdevelioğlu M; Güngör K; Erten H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):458-63. PubMed ID: 19033431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection.
    Alkurt MT; Peker I; Bala O; Altunkaynak B
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of digital and film panoramic radiographs for assessment of position and morphology of mandibular third molars and prevalence of dental anomalies and pathologies.
    Benediktsdottir IS; Hintze H; Petersen JK; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Mar; 32(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 12775665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of panoramic image quality between a digital radiography storage phosphor system and a film-based system.
    Parissis N; Angelopoulos C; Mantegari S; Karamanis S; Masood F; Tsirlis A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Jan; 11(1):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20098961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.
    Hintze H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film and the Siemens Sidexis digital imaging system for caries detection using receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Platin E; Nair M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Jan; 85(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 9474625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic accuracy of in vitro panoramic radiographs depending on the exposure.
    Kaeppler G; Dietz K; Reinert S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Feb; 36(2):68-74. PubMed ID: 17403882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of diagnostic accuracy of a newly developed photofluorographic panoramic system with conventional panoramic radiography.
    Nagata Y
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 11420624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital camera resolution and proximal caries detection.
    Prapayasatok S; Janhom A; Verochana K; Pramojanee S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 16798921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Film tomography compared with film and digital bitewing radiography for proximal caries detection.
    Peker I; Toraman Alkurt M; Altunkaynak B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):495-9. PubMed ID: 18033947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.