BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11314319)

  • 21. Radiation-absorbed doses and energy imparted from panoramic tomography, cephalometric radiography, and occlusal film radiography in children.
    Bankvall G; Håkansson HA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 May; 53(5):532-40. PubMed ID: 6954429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Radiologic exposure of the dental patient: comparison of the doses delivered by different techniques].
    Jones P; Reychler H; Engels H; Wambersie A
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2007; 62(1):4-24. PubMed ID: 18506961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A filter for use in lateral cephalography.
    Tanimoto K; Ogawa M; Kodera Y; Tomita S; Wada T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Nov; 68(5):666-9. PubMed ID: 2812721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography.
    Huda W
    Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S173-82; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dose-area product measurements and determination of conversion coefficients for the estimation of effective dose in dental lateral cephalometric radiology.
    Looe HK; Eenboom F; Chofor N; Pfaffenberger A; Sering M; Rühmann A; Poplawski A; Willborn K; Poppe B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 124(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 17309875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs.
    Ngan DC; Kharbanda OP; Geenty JP; Darendeliler MA
    Aust Orthod J; 2003 Nov; 19(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 14703331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Experimental study of intensifying screens used in diagnostic radiography (author's transl)].
    de Moras Y; Lucas P; Fauduet A; Pelgas MF; Serrurot M; Bausmayer J
    J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1978 Mar; 59(3):213-21. PubMed ID: 650634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Digital chest radiography system with amorphous selenium flat-panel detectors: Qualitative and dosimetric comparison with a dedicated film-screen system.
    Prato A; Ropolo R; Fava C
    Radiol Med; 2005; 110(5-6):561-73. PubMed ID: 16437042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Radiation doses of collimated vs non-collimated cephalometric exposures.
    Gijbels F; Sanderink G; Wyatt J; Van Dam J; Nowak B; Jacobs R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Mar; 32(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 12775668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of image quality on the identification of cephalometric landmarks.
    McWilliam JS; Welander U
    Angle Orthod; 1978 Jan; 48(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 272131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dose reduction by direct-digital cephalometric radiography.
    Visser H; Rödig T; Hermann KP
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Jun; 71(3):159-63. PubMed ID: 11407766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of surface and superficial dose for head and neck treatments using conventional or intensity-modulated techniques.
    Higgins PD; Han EY; Yuan JL; Hui S; Lee CK
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(4):1135-46. PubMed ID: 17264375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Safer radiologic examinations].
    Staniszewska MA; Jankowski J
    Med Pr; 1994; 45(6):529-36. PubMed ID: 7854111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Determination of absorbed doses of radiation in patients during periapical dental radiography].
    Donta-Bakoyianni CN
    Odontostomatol Proodos; 1990 Dec; 44(6):403-11. PubMed ID: 2130351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical evaluation of dose reduction on image quality of panoramic radiographs.
    Alkurt MT; Peker I; Usalan G; Altunkaynak B
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Jul; 9(5):34-41. PubMed ID: 18633467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Doses in the vicinity of mobile X-ray equipment in a children's intensive care unit.
    Milković D; Ranogajec-Komor M; Ivanovi-Herceg Z; Knezević Z; Bozinović D; Zagar I
    Coll Antropol; 2000 Jun; 24(1):235-40. PubMed ID: 10895550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Radiation protection guidelines for the practicing orthodontist.
    Mupparapu M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):168-72; discussion 172. PubMed ID: 16102399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dose contributions to the Swedish population from oral radiography.
    Stenström B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1986; 40():1-62. PubMed ID: 3467441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Update on the biological effects of ionizing radiation, relative dose factors and radiation hygiene.
    White SC; Mallya SM
    Aust Dent J; 2012 Mar; 57 Suppl 1():2-8. PubMed ID: 22376091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The use of computerised glow curve analysis will optimise personal thermoluminescence dosimetry measurements. Opposing the proposition.
    Pradhan AS; Yoder RC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 102(3):274-7. PubMed ID: 12430967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.