These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11314384)

  • 1. Internal craniofacial distraction with biodegradable devices: early stabilization and protected bone regeneration.
    Cohen SR; Holmes RE; Amis P; Fichtner H
    J Craniofac Surg; 2000 Jul; 11(4):354-66. PubMed ID: 11314384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Internal Le Fort III distraction with biodegradable devices.
    Cohen SR; Holmes RE
    J Craniofac Surg; 2001 May; 12(3):264-72. PubMed ID: 11358101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Le Fort III midfacial distraction using an internal distraction device for syndromic craniosynostosis: device selection, problems, indications, and a proposal for use of a parallel bar for device-setting.
    Satoh K; Mitsukawa N; Tosa Y; Kadomatsu K
    J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Nov; 17(6):1050-8. PubMed ID: 17119404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distraction osteogenesis in the surgical treatment of craniostenosis: a comparison of internal and external craniofacial distractor devices.
    Pelo S; Gasparini G; Di Petrillo A; Tamburrini G; Di Rocco C
    Childs Nerv Syst; 2007 Dec; 23(12):1447-53. PubMed ID: 17876585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible with an internal bioresorbable device.
    Margulis A; Patel PK; Daw JL; Bauer BS
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Sep; 14(5):791-6. PubMed ID: 14501350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cranium and midface distraction osteogenesis: current practices, controversies, and future applications.
    Marchac A; Arnaud E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 23(1):235-8. PubMed ID: 22337416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Review of devices for distraction osteogenesis of the craniofacial complex.
    Maull DJ
    Semin Orthod; 1999 Mar; 5(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 10371943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Complications in 54 frontofacial distraction procedures in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis.
    Goldstein JA; Paliga JT; Taylor JA; Bartlett SP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 25569391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distraction osteogenesis of the human craniofacial skeleton: initial experience with new distraction system.
    Cohen SR; Rutrick RE; Burstein FD
    J Craniofac Surg; 1995 Sep; 6(5):368-74. PubMed ID: 9020716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distraction osteogenesis of the ascending ramus for mandibular hypoplasia using extraoral or intraoral devices: a report of 8 cases.
    Rubio-Bueno P; Padrón A; Villa E; Díaz-González FJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Jun; 58(6):593-9; discussion 600-1. PubMed ID: 10847278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Single-stage craniofacial distraction using resorbable devices.
    Burstein FD; Williams JK; Hudgins R; Graham L; Teague G; Paschal M; Simms C
    J Craniofac Surg; 2002 Nov; 13(6):776-82. PubMed ID: 12457094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental mandibular regeneration by distraction osteogenesis with submerged devices: preliminary results of a canine model.
    Rubio-Bueno P; Sanromán F; García P; Sánchez M; Llorens P; Nieto S; Adrados M; Sastre J; de Artiñano FO; Amde S; Naval L; Díaz-González FJ
    J Craniofac Surg; 2002 Mar; 13(2):224-30. PubMed ID: 12000878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible using a submerged intraoral device: a report of three cases.
    Stucki-McCormick SU; Mizrahi RD; Fox RM; Romo T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Feb; 57(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 9973131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Introduction of a novel internal spring-driven craniofacial bone distraction device.
    Li M; Park SG; Kang DI; Eppley BL; Sadove AM; Coleman JJ
    J Craniofac Surg; 2004 Mar; 15(2):324-8. PubMed ID: 15167256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [New bone distraction device for induced osteogenesis of the mandible. Experience with 126 clinical cases].
    Fuente del Campo A
    Gac Med Mex; 2000; 136(6):537-46. PubMed ID: 11131855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The evolution of mandibular distraction: device selection.
    Davidson EH; Brown D; Shetye PR; Greig AVH; Grayson BH; Warren SM; McCarthy JG
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Dec; 126(6):2061-2070. PubMed ID: 20697312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maxillary-driven simultaneous maxillo-mandibular distraction for hemifacial microsomia.
    Nakajima H; Sakamoto Y; Tamada I; Ogata H; Kishi K; Sakamoto T
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 39(8):549-53. PubMed ID: 21195627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tacks: a new technique for craniofacial fixation.
    Cohen SR; Holmes RE; Amis P; Fitchner H; Shusterman EM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2001 Nov; 12(6):596-602. PubMed ID: 11711829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Bone distraction osteogenesis].
    Malevez Ch; Dujardin T; Glorieux V; Swennen G; Schutyser F; Van Cleynenbreugel J
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2002; 57(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 12649984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A custom-made distraction device for experimental mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
    Eski M; Nisanci M; Cil Y; Sengezer M; Ozcan A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 16(4):675-83. PubMed ID: 16077316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.