These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11314418)

  • 1. Gallium alloy versus high copper amalgam: a comparative evaluation of corrosion resistance and microleakage in the primary teeth.
    Munshi AK; Hegde AM; Bhaskar S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 11314418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gallium alloy restorations in primary teeth: a 12-month study.
    Kaga M; Nakajima H; Sakai T; Oguchi H
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Aug; 127(8):1195-200. PubMed ID: 8803395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative evaluation of clinical efficacy of gallium and amalgam alloys in primary molars.
    Singh R; Tandon S; Rakhee M
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2004 Jun; 22(2):68-72. PubMed ID: 15491089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of gallium alloy as a posterior restorative material.
    Navarro MF; Franco EB; Bastos PA; Teixeira LC; Carvalho RM
    Quintessence Int; 1996 May; 27(5):315-20. PubMed ID: 8941813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Handling characteristics of a gallium alloy triturated with alcohol.
    Mash LK; Miller BH; Nakajima H; Guo IY; Okabe T
    Am J Dent; 1997 Aug; 10(4):199-202. PubMed ID: 9590909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a gallium restorative alloy.
    Kiremitci A; Bolay S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Jun; 30(6):664-7. PubMed ID: 12787466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Handling characteristics of a palladium-free gallium-based alloy compared with a high copper dental amalgam in a simulated clinical trial.
    Shaini FJ; Shortall AC; Ellakwa AE; Marquis PM
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Nov; 28(11):1029-36. PubMed ID: 11722719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage of class 2 Superbond-lined composite restorations with and without a cervical amalgam base.
    Hovav S; Holan G; Lewinstein I; Fuks AB
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 8700773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.
    Parolia A; Kundabala M; Gupta V; Verma M; Batra C; Shenoy R; Srikant N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro corrosion behavior and microstructure examination of a gallium-based restorative.
    DeSchepper EJ; Oshida Y; Moore BK; Cook NB; Eggertson H
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(5):209-16. PubMed ID: 9484143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal microleakage in bonded amalgam restorations: a combined in vivo and in vitro study.
    Di Lenarda R; Cadenaro M; Gregorig G; De Stefano Dorigo E
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 11317396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage in alloy-glass ionomer lined amalgam restorations after thermocycling.
    Arcoria CJ; Fisher MA; Wagner MJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 1991 Jan; 18(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 2051252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Corrosion sealing of amalgam restorations in vitro.
    Mahler DB; Pham BV; Adey JD
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):312-20. PubMed ID: 19544821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal adaptation and micro-porosity of class II restorations of a high copper amalgam and a palladium-free gallium-based alloy.
    Shaini FJ; Wahab FK; Ellakwa AE; Shortall AC; Fleming GJ; Marquis PM
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):924-33. PubMed ID: 17168935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability of different techniques to assess marginal defects of Class II restorations in retrieved primary molars: a visual-tactile, SEM, dye penetration and polarized light microscopy study.
    Fuks AB; Araujo FB; Donly KJ; Cervantes M
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2002 Oct; 19(4):6-16, 67. PubMed ID: 12510251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Amalgam type, adhesive system, and storage period as influencing factors on microleakage of amalgam restorations.
    Ziskind D; Venezia E; Kreisman I; Mass E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Sep; 90(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 12942059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term monitoring of microleakage of different amalgams with different liners.
    Gallato A; Angnes G; Reis A; Loguercio AD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):571-6. PubMed ID: 15942619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage of amalgam alloys: an update.
    Mahler DB; Bryant RW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 127(9):1351-6. PubMed ID: 8854611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of laser pretreated enamel and dentin of primary teeth on microleakage of different restorative materials.
    Salama FS
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1998; 22(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 9796497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.