BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11314619)

  • 1. Radiographic evaluation of bone formation in the pterygoid region after maxillary distraction with a rigid external distraction (RED) device.
    Kusnoto B; Figueroa AA; Polley JW
    J Craniofac Surg; 2001 Mar; 12(2):109-17; discussion 118. PubMed ID: 11314619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate patients with skeletal anchorage.
    Minami K; Mori Y; Tae-Geon K; Shimizu H; Ohtani M; Yura Y
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2007 Mar; 44(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 17328638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis in the adolescent cleft patient: three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of linear and volumetric changes over five years.
    Chen PK; Por YC; Liou EJ; Chang FC
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2011 Jul; 48(4):445-54. PubMed ID: 20536369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Management of severe maxillary deficiency in childhood and adolescence through distraction osteogenesis with an external, adjustable, rigid distraction device.
    Polley JW; Figueroa AA
    J Craniofac Surg; 1997 May; 8(3):181-5; discussion 186. PubMed ID: 9482064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device in cleft maxillary deformities.
    Figueroa AA; Polley JW; Friede H; Ko EW
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Nov; 114(6):1382-92; discussion 1393-4. PubMed ID: 15509923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nonunion of the external maxillary distraction in cleft lip and palate: analysis of possible reasons.
    He D; Genecov DG; Barcelo R
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 68(10):2402-11. PubMed ID: 20605305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anterior maxillary segmental distraction for correction of maxillary hypoplasia and dental crowding in cleft palate patients: a preliminary report.
    Wang XX; Wang X; Li ZL; Yi B; Liang C; Jia YL; Zou BS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Dec; 38(12):1237-43. PubMed ID: 19720499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Maxillary distraction complications in cleft patients].
    Jeblaoui Y; Morand B; Brix M; Lebeau J; Bettega G
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2008 Sep; 109(4):218-24, discussion 224-5. PubMed ID: 18703208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrasonographic assessment of new bone formation in maxillary distraction osteogenesis.
    Mukai-Higashihori K; Baba Y; Tetsumura A; Tsuji M; Ishizaki T; Higashihori N; Ohbayashi N; Kurabayashi T; Suzuki S; Ohyama K
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Aug; 66(8):1750-3. PubMed ID: 18634970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vector alignment in maxillary distraction osteogenesis.
    Uckan S; Arman A; Bayram B; Celik E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 17(5):992-7. PubMed ID: 17003631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis using Le Fort I osteotomy without intraoperative down-fracture.
    Yamauchi K; Mitsugi M; Takahashi T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jun; 35(6):493-8. PubMed ID: 16513321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maxillary anterior segmental advancement of hypoplastic maxilla in cleft patients by distraction osteogenesis: report of 2 cases.
    Alkan A; Baş B; Ozer M; Bayram M; Yüzbasioğlu E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 66(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 18083426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Soft tissue profile changes after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis by use of a rigid external distraction device: a 1-year follow-up.
    Wen-Ching Ko E; Figueroa AA; Polley JW
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Sep; 58(9):959-69; discussion 969-70. PubMed ID: 10981975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A simple mechanism for measuring and adjusting distraction forces during maxillary advancement.
    Suzuki EY; Suzuki B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2245-53. PubMed ID: 19761920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Longitudinal dento-skeletal changes in UCLP patients following maxillary distraction osteogenesis using RED system.
    Suzuki EY; Motohashi N; Ohyama K
    J Med Dent Sci; 2004 Mar; 51(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 15137462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distraction osteogenesis of the hypoplastic midface using a rigid external distraction system: the results of a one- to six-year follow-up.
    Cho BC; Kyung HM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Oct; 118(5):1201-1212. PubMed ID: 17016191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maxillary advancement and transpalatal expansion using internal distraction in a patient with cleft lip and palate.
    Scolozzi P; Herzog G; Jaques B
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Sep; 19(5):1415-9. PubMed ID: 18812875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Skeletal and dental stability after maxillary distraction with a rigid external device in adult cleft lip and palate patients.
    Aksu M; Saglam-Aydinatay B; Akcan CA; El H; Taner T; Kocadereli I; Tuncbilek G; Mavili ME
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 68(2):254-9. PubMed ID: 20116692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Management of severe cleft maxillary deficiency with distraction osteogenesis: procedure and results.
    Figueroa AA; Polley JW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jan; 115(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 9878952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Midfacial changes through distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction system with retention plates in cleft lip and palate patients.
    Daimaruya T; Imai Y; Kochi S; Tachi M; Takano-Yamamoto T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1480-6. PubMed ID: 20417011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.