These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Biomechanical assessment of regenerate integrity in irradiated mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Schwarz DA; Jamali AM; Kakwan MS; Fregene A; Arman KG; Buchman SR Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Feb; 123(2 Suppl):114S-122S. PubMed ID: 19182670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of latency on the quality and quantity of bone produced by dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis. Moore C; Campbell PM; Dechow PC; Ellis ML; Buschang PH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):470-8. PubMed ID: 21967933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of distraction rate and consolidation period on bone density following mandibular osteodistraction in rats. King GJ; Liu ZJ; Wang LL; Chiu IY; Whelan MF; Huang GJ Arch Oral Biol; 2003 Apr; 48(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 12663075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of latency period in a rabbit mandibular distraction osteogenesis. Aida T; Yoshioka I; Tominaga K; Fukuda J Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Feb; 32(1):54-62; discussion 63. PubMed ID: 12653234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analysis of the biomechanical properties of the mandible after unilateral distraction osteogenesis. Schwarz DA; Arman KG; Kakwan MS; Jamali AM; Buchman SR Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Aug; 126(2):533-542. PubMed ID: 20375764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Angiogenesis is required for successful bone induction during distraction osteogenesis. Fang TD; Salim A; Xia W; Nacamuli RP; Guccione S; Song HM; Carano RA; Filvaroff EH; Bednarski MD; Giaccia AJ; Longaker MT J Bone Miner Res; 2005 Jul; 20(7):1114-24. PubMed ID: 15940364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experimental evaluation of acute molding of the regenerate in mandibular distraction osteogenesis in a rabbit model. Candırlı C; Dolanmaz D; Etöz OA; Avunduk MC Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Nov; 110(5):554-9. PubMed ID: 20576452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of distraction osteogenesis model of the inferior mandibular border and alveolar bone. Moon HS; Kim HJ; Teribish M; Park JT; Cha JY J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):715-9. PubMed ID: 21415642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy on Distraction Osteogenesis in Rat Mandible. Ginini JG; Maor G; Emodi O; Shilo D; Gabet Y; Aizenbud D; Rachmiel A Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Dec; 142(6):1501-1509. PubMed ID: 30188470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Guided tissue regeneration enhances bone formation in a rat model of failed osteogenesis. Fang TD; Nacamuli RP; Song HJ; Fong KD; Shi YY; Longaker MT Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Apr; 117(4):1177-85. PubMed ID: 16582784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 on mandibular distraction at different rates in an experimental model. Cheung LK; Zheng LW J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 17(1):100-8; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 16432416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How does the rate of dentoalveolar distraction affect the bone regenerate produced? Spencer AC; Campbell PM; Dechow P; Ellis ML; Buschang PH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):e211-21. PubMed ID: 22051499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]