282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11314711)
1. The nucleus double array cochlear implant: a new concept for the obliterated cochlea.
Lenarz T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Weber BP; Issing PR; Frohne C; Büchner A; Battmer RD; Parker J; von Wallenberg E
Otol Neurotol; 2001 Jan; 22(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 11314711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The Nucleus Double Array Cochlear Implant: a new concept in obliterated cochlea].
Lenarz T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Weber BP; Frohne C; Büchner A; Battmer RD; Parker J; von Wallenberg E
Laryngorhinootologie; 1999 Aug; 78(8):421-8. PubMed ID: 10488461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nucleus double electrode array: a new approach for ossified cochleae.
Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Lesinski A; Parker J
Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S39-41. PubMed ID: 9391590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The results in patients implanted with the nucleus double array cochlear implant: pitch discrimination and auditory performance.
Lenarz T; Büchner A; Tasche C; Cristofoli T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Wallenberg EV; Battmer RD; Busby PA; Frohne C
Ear Hear; 2002 Feb; 23(1 Suppl):90S-101S. PubMed ID: 11883772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cochlear pathology following reimplantation of a multichannel scala tympani electrode array in the macaque.
Shepherd RK; Clark GM; Xu SA; Pyman BC
Am J Otol; 1995 Mar; 16(2):186-99. PubMed ID: 8572119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improved auditory performance of cochlear implant patients using the middle fossa approach.
Colletti V; Fiorino FG; Saccetto L; Giarbini N; Carner M
Audiology; 1999; 38(4):225-34. PubMed ID: 10431908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiologic Results and Hearing Preservation With a Straight Narrow Electrode via Round Window Versus Cochleostomy Approach at Initial Activation.
Hassepass F; Aschendorff A; Bulla S; Arndt S; Maier W; Laszig R; Beck R
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):993-1000. PubMed ID: 25675315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of round window and cochleostomy approaches with a prototype hearing preservation electrode.
Briggs RJ; Tykocinski M; Xu J; Risi F; Svehla M; Cowan R; Stover T; Erfurt P; Lenarz T
Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():42-8. PubMed ID: 17063010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anatomy of the middle-turn cochleostomy.
Isaacson B; Roland PS; Wright CG
Laryngoscope; 2008 Dec; 118(12):2200-4. PubMed ID: 18948831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of cochlear morphology on the final electrode array position.
Ketterer MC; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Hassepass F; Wesarg T; Laszig R; Beck R
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 275(2):385-394. PubMed ID: 29242990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Multi-channel cochlear implant in cochlear ossification].
Pasanisi E; Bacciu A; Vincenti V; Guida M; Barbot A; Berghenti MT; Bacciu S
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2002 Jun; 22(3):127-34. PubMed ID: 12173282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Intracochlear electrode position: evaluation after deep insertion using cone beam computed tomography].
Güldner C; Weiss R; Eivazi B; Bien S; Werner JA; Diogo I
HNO; 2012 Sep; 60(9):817-22. PubMed ID: 22767189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical investigation of the Nucleus Slim Modiolar Electrode.
Aschendorff A; Briggs R; Brademann G; Helbig S; Hornung J; Lenarz T; Marx M; Ramos A; Stöver T; Escudé B; James CJ
Audiol Neurootol; 2017; 22(3):169-179. PubMed ID: 29059669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An overview of cochlear implant electrode array designs.
Dhanasingh A; Jolly C
Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 356():93-103. PubMed ID: 29102129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multichannel cochlear implantation in obliterated cochleas using the Gantz procedure.
Steenerson RL; Gary LB
Laryngoscope; 1994 Sep; 104(9):1071-3. PubMed ID: 8072351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intracochlear Position of Cochlear Implants Determined Using CT Scanning versus Fitting Levels: Higher Threshold Levels at Basal Turn.
van der Beek FB; Briaire JJ; van der Marel KS; Verbist BM; Frijns JH
Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(1):54-67. PubMed ID: 26891130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Delayed low frequency hearing loss caused by cochlear implantation interventions via the round window but not cochleostomy.
Rowe D; Chambers S; Hampson A; Eastwood H; Campbell L; O'Leary S
Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():49-57. PubMed ID: 26739790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Scalar localization of the electrode array after cochlear implantation: clinical experience using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography.
Lane JI; Witte RJ; Driscoll CL; Shallop JK; Beatty CW; Primak AN
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):658-62. PubMed ID: 17558341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Scalar localization by cone-beam computed tomography of cochlear implant carriers: a comparative study between straight and periomodiolar precurved electrode arrays.
Boyer E; Karkas A; Attye A; Lefournier V; Escude B; Schmerber S
Otol Neurotol; 2015 Mar; 36(3):422-9. PubMed ID: 25575374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults.
Aschendorff A; Kromeier J; Klenzner T; Laszig R
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):75S-79S. PubMed ID: 17496653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
