BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11315043)

  • 1. Empirical Bayes estimation of random effects parameters in mixed effects logistic regression models.
    Ten Have TR; Localio AR
    Biometrics; 1999 Dec; 55(4):1022-9. PubMed ID: 11315043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods.
    Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Strategies for analyzing multilevel cluster-randomized studies with binary outcomes collected at varying intervals of time.
    Olsen MK; DeLong ER; Oddone EZ; Bosworth HB
    Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(29):6055-71. PubMed ID: 18825655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Likelihood-based random-effects meta-analysis with few studies: empirical and simulation studies.
    Seide SE; Röver C; Friede T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):16. PubMed ID: 30634920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of analytic approaches for individual patient data meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
    Thomas D; Platt R; Benedetti A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):28. PubMed ID: 28202011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An assessment of estimation methods for generalized linear mixed models with binary outcomes.
    Capanu M; Gönen M; Begg CB
    Stat Med; 2013 Nov; 32(26):4550-66. PubMed ID: 23839712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On fitting spatio-temporal disease mapping models using approximate Bayesian inference.
    Ugarte MD; Adin A; Goicoa T; Militino AF
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2014 Dec; 23(6):507-30. PubMed ID: 24713158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation in Bayesian disease mapping.
    MacNab YC; Farrell PJ; Gustafson P; Wen S
    Biometrics; 2004 Dec; 60(4):865-73. PubMed ID: 15606406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A general maximum likelihood analysis of variance components in generalized linear models.
    Aitkin M
    Biometrics; 1999 Mar; 55(1):117-28. PubMed ID: 11318145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of analytical methods for overdispersed counts in cluster randomized trials: sample size, degree of clustering and imbalance.
    Durán Pacheco G; Hattendorf J; Colford JM; Mäusezahl D; Smith T
    Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):2989-3011. PubMed ID: 19672840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the performance of Bayesian and restricted maximum likelihood estimation for stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters.
    Grantham KL; Kasza J; Heritier S; Carlin JB; Forbes AB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):112. PubMed ID: 35418034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accommodating negative intracluster correlation with a mixed effects logistic model for bivariate binary data.
    Ten Have TR; Kunselman A; Zharichenko E
    J Biopharm Stat; 1998 Mar; 8(1):131-49. PubMed ID: 9547432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Empirical Bayes estimation and inference for the random effects model with binary response.
    Waclawiw MA; Liang KY
    Stat Med; 1994 Mar 15-Apr 15; 13(5-7):541-51. PubMed ID: 8023034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Empirical Bayes Gaussian likelihood estimation of exposure distributions from pooled samples in human biomonitoring.
    Li X; Kuk AY; Xu J
    Stat Med; 2014 Dec; 33(28):4999-5014. PubMed ID: 25213192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Avoiding zero between-study variance estimates in random-effects meta-analysis.
    Chung Y; Rabe-Hesketh S; Choi IH
    Stat Med; 2013 Oct; 32(23):4071-89. PubMed ID: 23670939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sample size adjustments for varying cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes analyzed with second-order PQL mixed logistic regression.
    Candel MJ; Van Breukelen GJ
    Stat Med; 2010 Jun; 29(14):1488-501. PubMed ID: 20101669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginally specified logistic-normal models for longitudinal binary data.
    Heagerty PJ
    Biometrics; 1999 Sep; 55(3):688-98. PubMed ID: 11314994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correcting for Sampling Error in between-Cluster Effects: An Empirical Bayes Cluster-Mean Approach with Finite Population Corrections.
    Lai MHC; Zhang Y; Ji F
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2024; 59(3):584-598. PubMed ID: 38348654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating multilevel logistic regression models when the number of clusters is low: a comparison of different statistical software procedures.
    Austin PC
    Int J Biostat; 2010 Apr; 6(1):Article 16. PubMed ID: 20949128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistical models for autocorrelated count data.
    Nelson KP; Leroux BG
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(8):1413-30. PubMed ID: 16196078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.