BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11315236)

  • 1. DXA of the hip and heel ultrasound but not densitometry of the fingers can discriminate female hip fracture patients from controls: a comparison between four different methods.
    Ekman A; Michaëlsson K; Petrén-Mallmin M; Ljunghall S; Mallmin H
    Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 11315236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discrimination of hip fractures by quantitative ultrasound of the phalanges and the calcaneus and dual X-ray absorptiometry.
    Damilakis J; Papadokostakis G; Perisinakis K; Maris T; Dimitriou P; Hadjipavlou A; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Eur J Radiol; 2004 Jun; 50(3):268-72. PubMed ID: 15145486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with proximal femoral fractures--comparative study between quantitative ultrasonometry and gold standard DXA].
    Schnabel M; Eser G; Ziller V; Mann D; Mann E; Hadji P
    Zentralbl Chir; 2005 Oct; 130(5):469-75. PubMed ID: 16220445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of a new quantitative ultrasound calcaneus measurement: precision and discrimination of hip fractures in elderly women compared with dual X-ray absorptiometry.
    He YQ; Fan B; Hans D; Li J; Wu CY; Njeh CF; Zhao S; Lu Y; Tsuda-Futami E; Fuerst T; Genant HK
    Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(4):354-60. PubMed ID: 10928226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dual X-ray absorptiometry of hip, heel ultrasound, and densitometry of fingers can discriminate male patients with hip fracture from control subjects: a comparison of four different methods.
    Ekman A; Michaëlsson K; Petrén-Mallmin M; Ljunghall S; Mallmin H
    J Clin Densitom; 2002; 5(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 11940732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the prediction of fragility fracture in men.
    Gonnelli S; Cepollaro C; Gennari L; Montagnani A; Caffarelli C; Merlotti D; Rossi S; Cadirni A; Nuti R
    Osteoporos Int; 2005 Aug; 16(8):963-8. PubMed ID: 15599495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Calcaneus ultrasonometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the evaluation of vertebral fracture risk.
    Frediani B; Acciai C; Falsetti P; Baldi F; Filippou G; Siagkri C; Spreafico A; Galeazzi M; Marcolongo R
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2006 Oct; 79(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 16969597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of ultrasound and X-ray absorptiometry bone measurements in a case control study of female rheumatoid arthritis patients and randomly selected subjects in the population.
    Haugeberg G; Ørstavik RE; Uhlig T; Falch JA; Halse JI; Kvien TK
    Osteoporos Int; 2003 Jun; 14(4):312-9. PubMed ID: 12730749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Device-specific thresholds to diagnose osteoporosis at the proximal femur: an approach to interpreting peripheral bone measurements in clinical practice.
    Clowes JA; Peel NF; Eastell R
    Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(9):1293-302. PubMed ID: 16810454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry.
    El-Desouki MI; Sherafzal MS; Othman SA
    Saudi Med J; 2005 Sep; 26(9):1346-50. PubMed ID: 16155646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification.
    Grampp S; Genant HK; Mathur A; Lang P; Jergas M; Takada M; Glüer CC; Lu Y; Chavez M
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):697-711. PubMed ID: 9144335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does the combination of quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry improve fracture discrimination?
    Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
    Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(6):471-7. PubMed ID: 11446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ultrasound measurements at the proximal phalanges in healthy women and patients with hip fractures.
    Alenfeld FE; Wüster C; Funck C; Pereira-Lima JF; Fritz T; Meeder PJ; Ziegler R
    Osteoporos Int; 1998; 8(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 9850344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The utility of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, calcaneal quantitative ultrasound, and fracture risk indices (FRAX® and Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument) for the identification of women with distal forearm or hip fractures: A pilot study.
    Esmaeilzadeh S; Cesme F; Oral A; Yaliman A; Sindel D
    Endocr Res; 2016 Aug; 41(3):248-60. PubMed ID: 26864472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identifying postmenopausal women with osteoporosis by calcaneal ultrasound, metacarpal digital X-ray radiogrammetry and phalangeal radiographic absorptiometry: a comparative study.
    Boonen S; Nijs J; Borghs H; Peeters H; Vanderschueren D; Luyten FP
    Osteoporos Int; 2005 Jan; 16(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 15197540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discriminatory ability of quantitative ultrasound measurements is similar to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in a Brazilian women population with osteoporotic fracture.
    Pinheiro MM; Castro CH; Frisoli A; Szejnfeld VL
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2003 Dec; 73(6):555-64. PubMed ID: 14517710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Femur ultrasound (FemUS)--first clinical results on hip fracture discrimination and estimation of femoral BMD.
    Barkmann R; Dencks S; Laugier P; Padilla F; Brixen K; Ryg J; Seekamp A; Mahlke L; Bremer A; Heller M; Glüer CC
    Osteoporos Int; 2010 Jun; 21(6):969-76. PubMed ID: 19693640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contact quantitative ultrasound: an evaluation of precision, fracture discrimination, age-related bone loss and applicability of the WHO criteria.
    Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
    Osteoporos Int; 1999; 10(6):441-9. PubMed ID: 10663343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation of quantitative heel ultrasonography with central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric bone mineral density in postmenopausal women.
    Larijani B; Dabbaghmanesh MH; Aghakhani S; Sedaghat M; Hamidi Z; Rahimi E
    J Ultrasound Med; 2005 Jul; 24(7):941-6. PubMed ID: 15972708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discriminative ability of heel quantitative ultrasound in postmenopausal women with prevalent vertebral fractures: application of optimal threshold cutoff values using classification and regression tree models.
    Navarro Mdel C; Saavedra P; Gómez-de-Tejada MJ; Suárez M; Hernández D; Sosa M
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2012 Aug; 91(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 22752617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.