430 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11315379)
1. Restorative pulpal and repair responses.
Murray PE; About I; Franquin JC; Remusat M; Smith AJ
J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Apr; 132(4):482-91. PubMed ID: 11315379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bacterial microleakage and pulp inflammation associated with various restorative materials.
Murray PE; Hafez AA; Smith AJ; Cox CF
Dent Mater; 2002 Sep; 18(6):470-8. PubMed ID: 12098576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identification of hierarchical factors to guide clinical decision making for successful long-term pulp capping.
Murray PE; Hafez AA; Smith AJ; Cox CF
Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 12674361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pulpal response to a newly developed MMA based resin cement for bonding tooth-colored indirect restorations.
Seki Y; Shimada Y; Foxton RM; Tagami J
Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 17076029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reactions of dentin and pulp to drugs and restorative materials.
Frank RM
J Dent Res; 1975 Jun; 54 Spec No B():B176-87. PubMed ID: 1094043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Interactions between cavity preparation and restoration events and their effects on pulp vitality.
Wisithphrom K; Murray PE; About I; Windsor LJ
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Dec; 26(6):596-605. PubMed ID: 17243333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cavity remaining dentin thickness and pulpal activity.
Murray PE; About I; Lumley PJ; Franquin JC; Remusat M; Smith AJ
Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 12074229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of cavity restoration variables on odontoblast cell numbers and dental repair.
About I; Murray PE; Franquin JC; Remusat M; Smith AJ
J Dent; 2001 Feb; 29(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 11239585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Human pulp reaction to dentine bonded amalgam restorations: a histologic study.
Sübay RK; Cox CF; Kaya H; Tarim B; Sübay AA; Nayir M
J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):327-32. PubMed ID: 10785298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pulpal response to a resin-modified glass-ionomer material on nonexposed and exposed monkey pulps.
Tarim B; Hafez AA; Cox CF
Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):535-42. PubMed ID: 9807135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of pulp responses following restoration of exposed and non-exposed cavities.
Murray PE; Hafez AA; Windsor LJ; Smith AJ; Cox CF
J Dent; 2002; 30(5-6):213-22. PubMed ID: 12450712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short-term evaluation of the pulpo-dentin complex response to a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and a bonding agent applied in deep cavities.
Costa CA; Giro EM; do Nascimento AB; Teixeira HM; Hebling J
Dent Mater; 2003 Dec; 19(8):739-46. PubMed ID: 14511732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
Banomyong D; Messer H
J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biocompatibility of a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement applied as pulp capping in human teeth.
do Nascimento AB; Fontana UF; Teixeira HM; Costa CA
Am J Dent; 2000 Feb; 13(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 11763899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects on pulp tissue of microleakage in resin composite restorations.
Sasafuchi Y; Otsuki M; Inokoshi S; Tagami J
J Med Dent Sci; 1999 Dec; 46(4):155-64. PubMed ID: 12160253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histopathology study on pulp response to glass ionomers in human teeth.
Mousavinasab M; Namazikhah MS; Sarabi N; Jajarm HH; Bidar M; Ghavamnasiri M
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2008 Jan; 36(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 18293762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of pulp responses to resin composites.
Murray PE; Windsor LJ; Hafez AA; Stevenson RG; Cox CF
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 12760695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.
da Silva AF; Piva E; Demarco FF; Correr Sobrinho L; Osinga PW
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
