These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11315707)

  • 1. Selection of controls--always a challenge.
    Scoccia B; Elter K; Nelson LR
    Fertil Steril; 2001 Apr; 75(4):835-7. PubMed ID: 11315707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. We are overinterpreting the predictive value of serum follicle-stimulating hormone levels.
    Barnhart K; Osheroff J
    Fertil Steril; 1999 Jul; 72(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 10428140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Value of elevated basal follicle-stimulating hormone levels and the differential diagnosis during the diagnostic subfertility work-up.
    Lambalk CB
    Fertil Steril; 2003 Mar; 79(3):489-90. PubMed ID: 12620426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The predictive value for in vitro fertility delivery rates is greatly impacted by the method used to select the threshold between normal and elevated basal follicle-stimulating hormone.
    Scott RT; Elkind-Hirsch KE; Styne-Gross A; Miller KA; Frattarelli JL
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Apr; 89(4):868-78. PubMed ID: 17603049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Value of the day 3 follicle-stimulating hormone measurement.
    Wolff EF; Taylor HS
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Jun; 81(6):1486-8; discussion 496-7. PubMed ID: 15193463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of ovarian reserve by using the follicle-stimulating hormone isoform distribution pattern to predict the outcome of in vitro fertilization.
    Letterie GS; Lee JS; Padmanabhan V
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5):1547-9. PubMed ID: 16999956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fine tuning cycle day 3 hormonal assessment of ovarian reserve improves in vitro fertilization outcome in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles.
    Jurema MW; Bracero NJ; Garcia JE
    Fertil Steril; 2003 Nov; 80(5):1156-61. PubMed ID: 14607567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Concluding letter from Robert F. Harrison on the predictive value of serum FSH levels.
    McDonough PG
    Fertil Steril; 2000 Feb; 73(2):421. PubMed ID: 10685557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Prognostic role of age and base hormonal levels in infertility treatment].
    Rongières-Bertrand C; Olivennes F; Fanchin R; Fernandez H; Righini C; Sarranti L; Hazout A; Glissant M; Frydman R
    Contracept Fertil Sex; 1997 Mar; 25(3):202-5. PubMed ID: 9156708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The reproducibility of serum anti-Müllerian hormone in subfertile women: within and between patient variability.
    Rustamov O; Pemberton PW; Roberts SA; Smith A; Yates AP; Patchava SD; Nardo LG
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Mar; 95(3):1185-7. PubMed ID: 21036350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Follicle-stimulating hormone isoforms are not useful as pretreatment predictors of outcome in in vitro fertilization: a pilot study.
    Smeenk JM; Braat DD; Kremer JA; Sweep FC; Thomas CM
    Fertil Steril; 2006 May; 85(5):1519-22. PubMed ID: 16579995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Follicle stimulating hormone as a predictor of fertility.
    Barnhart K; Osheroff J
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 10(3):227-32. PubMed ID: 9619346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modest follicle-stimulating hormone elevations in younger women: warn but don't disqualify.
    Toner JP
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Jun; 81(6):1493-5; discussion 496-7. PubMed ID: 15193465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How FSH and AMH reflect probabilities of oocyte numbers in poor prognosis patients with small oocyte yields.
    Gleicher N; Darmon SK; Kushnir VA; Weghofer A; Wang Q; Zhang L; Albertini DF; Barad DH
    Endocrine; 2016 Nov; 54(2):476-483. PubMed ID: 27510172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of basal follicle-stimulating hormone versus the clomiphene citrate challenge test for ovarian reserve screening.
    Jain T; Soules MR; Collins JA
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Jul; 82(1):180-5. PubMed ID: 15237009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The value of day 3 follicle-stimulating hormone levels.
    Harrison RF
    Fertil Steril; 2000 Feb; 73(2):420-1. PubMed ID: 10685556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (Gonal F) and recombinant luteinizing hormone (Luveris) for multiple follicular stimulation in patients with a suboptimal response to in vitro fertilization.
    Lisi F; Rinaldi L; Fishel S; Lisi R; Pepe G; Picconeri MG
    Fertil Steril; 2003 Apr; 79(4):1037-8. PubMed ID: 12749452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anti-Mullerian hormone is a better marker than inhibin B, follicle stimulating hormone, estradiol or antral follicle count in predicting the outcome of in vitro fertilization.
    Kunt C; Ozaksit G; Keskin Kurt R; Cakir Gungor AN; Kanat-Pektas M; Kilic S; Dede A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Jun; 283(6):1415-21. PubMed ID: 21562964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does the time interval between antimüllerian hormone serum sampling and initiation of ovarian stimulation affect its predictive ability in in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist? A retrospective single-center study.
    Polyzos NP; Nelson SM; Stoop D; Nwoye M; Humaidan P; Anckaert E; Devroey P; Tournaye H
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Aug; 100(2):438-44. PubMed ID: 23602319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The forgotten variable: impact of luteinizing hormone on the prediction of ovarian reserve.
    Weghofer A; Feichtinger W
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Jan; 85(1):259-61. PubMed ID: 16412772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.