These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11315781)

  • 41. Fate of cementless acetabular components retained during revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Beaulé PE; Le Duff MJ; Dorey FJ; Amstutz HC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Dec; 85(12):2288-93. PubMed ID: 14668496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Periprosthetic bone remodelling of two types of uncemented femoral implant with proximal hydroxyapatite coating: a 3-year follow-up study addressing the influence of prosthesis design and preoperative bone density on periprosthetic bone loss.
    Rahmy AI; Gosens T; Blake GM; Tonino A; Fogelman I
    Osteoporos Int; 2004 Apr; 15(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 14661072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Finite element analysis of cementless femoral stems based on mid- and long-term radiological evaluation.
    Matsuyama K; Ishidou Y; Guo YM; Kakoi H; Setoguchi T; Nagano S; Kawamura I; Maeda S; Komiya S
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Sep; 17(1):397. PubMed ID: 27642748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Is a modular dual mobility acetabulum a viable option for the young, active total hip arthroplasty patient?
    Nam D; Salih R; Nahhas CR; Barrack RL; Nunley RM
    Bone Joint J; 2019 Apr; 101-B(4):365-371. PubMed ID: 30929489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Bone preserving level of osteotomy in short-stem total hip arthroplasty does not influence stress shielding dimensions - a comparing finite elements analysis.
    Burchard R; Braas S; Soost C; Graw JA; Schmitt J
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Aug; 18(1):343. PubMed ID: 28784121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Periprosthetic Bone Remodeling After Novel Short-Stem Neck-Sparing Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Tran P; Zhang BX; Lade JA; Pianta RM; Unni RP; Haw CS
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2530-2535. PubMed ID: 27236743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Increase in physical activity after resurfacing hip arthroplasty is associated with calcar and acetabular bone mineral density changes.
    Gerhardt DM; Hannink G; Rijnders T; van Susante JL
    Hip Int; 2017 Mar; 27(2):140-146. PubMed ID: 28218380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Larger femoral periprosthetic bone mineral density decrease following total hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture than for osteoarthritis: a prospective, observational cohort study.
    Mann T; Eisler T; Bodén H; Muren O; Stark A; Salemyr M; Sköldenberg O
    J Orthop Res; 2015 Apr; 33(4):504-12. PubMed ID: 25663278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A comparison of the effects of alendronate and alfacalcidol on bone mineral density around the femoral implant and in the lumbar spine after total hip arthroplasty.
    Iwamoto N; Inaba Y; Kobayashi N; Ishida T; Yukizawa Y; Saito T
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Jul; 93(13):1203-9. PubMed ID: 21776573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Treatment of pelvic osteolysis associated with a stable acetabular component inserted without cement as part of a total hip replacement.
    Maloney WJ; Herzwurm P; Paprosky W; Rubash HE; Engh CA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Nov; 79(11):1628-34. PubMed ID: 9384421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Primary hybrid total hip replacement, performed with insertion of the acetabular component without cement and a precoat femoral component with cement. An average ten-year follow-up study.
    Clohisy JC; Harris WH
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Feb; 81(2):247-55. PubMed ID: 10073588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison of native anatomy with recommended safe component orientation in total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis.
    Merle C; Grammatopoulos G; Waldstein W; Pegg E; Pandit H; Aldinger PR; Gill HS; Murray DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Nov; 95(22):e172. PubMed ID: 24257672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Peri-acetabular bone remodelling after uncemented total hip arthroplasty with monoblock press-fit cups: an observational study.
    Anderl C; Mattiassich G; Ortmaier R; Steinmair M; Hochreiter J
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Oct; 21(1):652. PubMed ID: 33023553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Changes in the bone mineral density in the acetabulum and proximal femur after cementless total hip replacement: alumina-on-alumina versus alumina-on-polyethylene articulation.
    Kim YH; Yoon SH; Kim JS
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Feb; 89(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 17322430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Bone Preservation in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Anderl C; Steinmair M; Hochreiter J
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jun; 37(6):1118-1123. PubMed ID: 35121089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Long-term results of the ABG-1 hydroxyapatite coated total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 111 cases with a minimum follow-up of 10 years.
    Bidar R; Kouyoumdjian P; Munini E; Asencio G
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Dec; 95(8):579-87. PubMed ID: 19926546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Mid-term study of bone remodeling after femoral cemented stem implantation: comparison between DXA and finite element simulation.
    Herrera A; Rebollo S; Ibarz E; Mateo J; Gabarre S; Gracia L
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jan; 29(1):90-100. PubMed ID: 23725926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Periprosthetic BMD after cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a 10-year follow-up study.
    Tapaninen T; Kröger H; Venesmaa P
    J Orthop Sci; 2015 Jul; 20(4):657-62. PubMed ID: 25850905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Segmental acetabular rim defects, bone loss, oversizing, and press fit cup in total hip arthroplasty evaluated with a probabilistic finite element analysis.
    Amirouche F; Solitro GF; Walia A; Gonzalez M; Bobko A
    Int Orthop; 2017 Aug; 41(8):1527-1533. PubMed ID: 28012048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. An Isoelastic Monoblock Cup Retains More Acetabular and Femoral Bone Than a Modular Press-Fit Cup: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Brodt S; Jacob B; Nowack D; Zippelius T; Strube P; Matziolis G
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2021 Jun; 103(11):992-999. PubMed ID: 33617161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.