210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11315891)
1. A prospective controlled trial of an ultrathin versus a conventional endoscope in unsedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Mulcahy HE; Riches A; Kiely M; Farthing MJ; Fairclough PD
Endoscopy; 2001 Apr; 33(4):311-6. PubMed ID: 11315891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective randomized comparison of unsedated ultrathin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: does it work better through the nose?
Birkner B; Fritz N; Schatke W; Hasford J
Endoscopy; 2003 Aug; 35(8):647-51. PubMed ID: 12929058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized prospective trial comparing unsedated esophagoscopy via transnasal and transoral routes using a 4-mm video endoscope with conventional endoscopy with sedation.
Thota PN; Zuccaro G; Vargo JJ; Conwell DL; Dumot JA; Xu M
Endoscopy; 2005 Jun; 37(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 15933930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Unsedated transnasal versus transoral sedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a one-series prospective study on safety and patient acceptability.
Stroppa I; Grasso E; Paoluzi OA; Razzini C; Tosti C; Andrei F; Biancone L; Palmieri G; Romeo F; Pallone F
Dig Liver Dis; 2008 Sep; 40(9):767-75. PubMed ID: 18424197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized trial of unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus peroral small-caliber EGD versus conventional EGD.
Preiss C; Charton JP; Schumacher B; Neuhaus H
Endoscopy; 2003 Aug; 35(8):641-6. PubMed ID: 12929057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feasibility and tolerance of 2-way and 4-way angulation videoscopes for unsedated patients undergoing transnasal EGD in GI cancer screening.
Tatsumi Y; Harada A; Matsumoto T; Tani T; Nishida H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Jun; 67(7):1021-7. PubMed ID: 18279865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transnasal gastroscopy compared to conventional gastroscopy: a randomized study of feasibility, safety, and tolerance.
Campo R; Montserrat A; Brullet E
Endoscopy; 1998 Jun; 30(5):448-52. PubMed ID: 9693891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sedation versus no sedation in the performance of diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a Canadian randomized controlled cost-outcome study.
Abraham NS; Fallone CA; Mayrand S; Huang J; Wieczorek P; Barkun AN
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Sep; 99(9):1692-9. PubMed ID: 15330904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Prospective study comparing conventional and transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy for routine diagnosis].
Krakamp B; Parusel M; Saers T
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2004 Jan; 129(3):82-6. PubMed ID: 14724781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Unsedated peroral endoscopy with a video ultrathin endoscope: patient acceptance, tolerance, and diagnostic accuracy.
Zaman A; Hapke R; Sahagun G; Katon RM
Am J Gastroenterol; 1998 Aug; 93(8):1260-3. PubMed ID: 9707048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transnasal endoscopy is preferred by transoral endoscopy experienced patients.
Kadayifci A; Atar M; Parlar S; Balkan A; Koruk I; Koruk M
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis; 2014 Mar; 23(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 24689093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective randomized comparative study on the safety and tolerability of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Yagi J; Adachi K; Arima N; Tanaka S; Ose T; Azumi T; Sasaki H; Sato M; Kinoshita Y
Endoscopy; 2005 Dec; 37(12):1226-31. PubMed ID: 16329022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening flexible sigmoidoscopy using an upper endoscope is better tolerated by women.
Farraye FA; Horton K; Hersey H; Trnka Y; Heeren T; Provenzale D
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jun; 99(6):1074-80. PubMed ID: 15180728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of thin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Wilkins T; Brewster A; Lammers J
J Fam Pract; 2002 Jul; 51(7):625-9. PubMed ID: 12160501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patients' perception of transnasal gastroscopy.
Luman W
Singapore Med J; 2008 Apr; 49(4):339-41. PubMed ID: 18418528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective, randomized controlled trial of sedation vs. no sedation in outpatient diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Fisher NC; Bailey S; Gibson JA
Endoscopy; 1998 Jan; 30(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 9548039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Unsedated transnasal versus conventional oral endoscopy in endoscopy naïve patients.
Kadayifci A; Parlar S; Aydinli M; Dag MS; Demir U; Savas MC
Acta Gastroenterol Belg; 2014 Jun; 77(2):224-8. PubMed ID: 25090820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are patients' sedation preferences at gastroscopy influenced by preceding patients' decisions?
Olithselvan A; McIntyre AS; Gorard DA
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2004 Nov; 20(9):989-92. PubMed ID: 15521847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective randomized trial of transnasal versus peroral endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope in unsedated patients.
Murata A; Akahoshi K; Sumida Y; Yamamoto H; Nakamura K; Nawata H
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Apr; 22(4):482-5. PubMed ID: 17376037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective evaluation of a new ultrathin one-plane bending videoendoscope for transnasal EGD: a comparative study on performance and tolerance.
Dumortier J; Josso C; Roman S; Fumex F; Lepilliez V; Prost B; Lot M; Guillaud O; Petit-Laurent F; Lapalus MG; Ponchon T
Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Jul; 66(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 17591468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
