126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11316214)
1. Esophageal pH monitoring: are you sure that the electrode is properly placed?
Monés J; Clavé P; Mearin F
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Apr; 96(4):975-8. PubMed ID: 11316214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accurate placement of the esophageal pH electrode for 24-hour pH monitoring using a combined pH/manometry probe.
Klingler PJ; Hinder RA; Wetscher GJ; Davis DM; Achem SR; Seelig MH; O'Brien P; DeVault KR
Am J Gastroenterol; 2000 Apr; 95(4):906-9. PubMed ID: 10763935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dual site ambulatory pH monitoring: a probe across the lower esophageal sphincter does not induce gastroesophageal reflux.
Decktor DL; Krawet SH; Rodriguez SL; Robinson M; Castell DO
Am J Gastroenterol; 1996 Jun; 91(6):1162-6. PubMed ID: 8651164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ambulatory 24-hour double-probe pH monitoring: the importance of manometry.
Johnson PE; Koufman JA; Nowak LJ; Belafsky PC; Postma GN
Laryngoscope; 2001 Nov; 111(11 Pt 1):1970-5. PubMed ID: 11801980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The LES locator: accurate placement of an electrode for 24-hour pH measurement with a combined solid state pressure transducer.
Singh S; Price JE; Richter JE
Am J Gastroenterol; 1992 Aug; 87(8):967-70. PubMed ID: 1642219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Esophageal 24-h pH monitoring: is prior manometry necessary for correct positioning of the electrode?
Klauser AG; Schindlbeck NE; Müller-Lissner SA
Am J Gastroenterol; 1990 Nov; 85(11):1463-7. PubMed ID: 2239874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the Bravo wireless and Digitrapper catheter-based pH monitoring systems for measuring esophageal acid exposure.
Pandolfino JE; Schreiner MA; Lee TJ; Zhang Q; Boniquit C; Kahrilas PJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2005 Jul; 100(7):1466-76. PubMed ID: 15984967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Normal and abnormal proximal esophageal acid exposure: results of ambulatory dual-probe pH monitoring.
Dobhan R; Castell DO
Am J Gastroenterol; 1993 Jan; 88(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 8420269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Twenty-four hour ambulatory simultaneous impedance and pH monitoring: a multicenter report of normal values from 60 healthy volunteers.
Shay S; Tutuian R; Sifrim D; Vela M; Wise J; Balaji N; Zhang X; Adhami T; Murray J; Peters J; Castell D
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jun; 99(6):1037-43. PubMed ID: 15180722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Typical GERD symptoms and esophageal pH monitoring are not enough to diagnose pharyngeal reflux.
Oelschlager BK; Chang L; Pope CE; Pellegrini CA
J Surg Res; 2005 Sep; 128(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 16115493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Safety and tolerability of transoral Bravo capsule placement after transnasal manometry using a validated conversion factor.
Lacy BE; O'Shana T; Hynes M; Kelley ML; Weiss JE; Paquette L; Rothstein RI
Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Jan; 102(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 17100980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laryngopharyngeal reflux identified using a new catheter design: defining normal values and excluding artifacts.
Maldonado A; Diederich L; Castell DO; Gideon RM; Katz PO
Laryngoscope; 2003 Feb; 113(2):349-55. PubMed ID: 12567094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Twenty-four-hour esophageal impedance-pH monitoring in healthy preterm neonates: rate and characteristics of acid, weakly acidic, and weakly alkaline gastroesophageal reflux.
López-Alonso M; Moya MJ; Cabo JA; Ribas J; del Carmen Macías M; Silny J; Sifrim D
Pediatrics; 2006 Aug; 118(2):e299-308. PubMed ID: 16831894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Significantly reduced acid detection at 10 centimeters compared to 5 centimeters above lower esophageal sphincter in patients with acid reflux.
Anggiansah A; Sumboonnanonda K; Wang J; Linsell J; Hale P; Owen WJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 1993 Jun; 88(6):842-6. PubMed ID: 8503377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transsphincteric pH profile at the gastroesophageal junction.
Mekapati J; Knight LC; Maurer AH; Fisher RS; Parkman HP
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Jun; 6(6):630-4. PubMed ID: 18378499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Wireless esophageal pH monitoring is better tolerated than the catheter-based technique: results from a randomized cross-over trial.
Wenner J; Johnsson F; Johansson J; Oberg S
Am J Gastroenterol; 2007 Feb; 102(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 17100971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations and reflux: mechanistic analysis using concurrent fluoroscopy and high-resolution manometry.
Pandolfino JE; Zhang QG; Ghosh SK; Han A; Boniquit C; Kahrilas PJ
Gastroenterology; 2006 Dec; 131(6):1725-33. PubMed ID: 17087957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wireless pH recording immediately above the squamocolumnar junction improves the diagnostic performance of esophageal pH studies.
Wenner J; Hall M; Höglund P; Johansson J; Johnsson F; Oberg S
Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Dec; 103(12):2977-85. PubMed ID: 18786112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative pre- and postoperative results analysis of functional state of the esophagus assessment in patients with various stages of achalasia.
Onopriev VI; Durleshter VM; Ryabchun VV
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Jul; 28(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15936950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characteristics and clinical relevance of proximal esophageal pH monitoring.
Cool M; Poelmans J; Feenstra L; Tack J
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Dec; 99(12):2317-23. PubMed ID: 15571576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
