356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11317385)
1. Durability of new restorative materials in Class III cavities.
van Dijken JW
J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 11317385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Longevity of new hybrid restorative materials in class III cavities.
van Dijken JW
Eur J Oral Sci; 1999 Jun; 107(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 10424386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fracture frequency and longevity of fractured resin composite, polyacid-modified resin composite, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement class IV restorations: an up to 14 years of follow-up.
van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Apr; 14(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 19504133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials--3-year results.
Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Mar; 5(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 11355096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class III restorations.
van Dijken JW
Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 9545903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions. 5-year results.
Folwaczny M; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 11572293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
Ermiş RB
Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions.
Loguercio AD; Reis A; Barbosa AN; Roulet JF
J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(4):323-32. PubMed ID: 15008339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine.
Dietrich T; Lösche AC; Lösche GM; Roulet JF
J Dent; 1999 Feb; 27(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 10071469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
van Dijken JW
J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial of conventional and heavy flowable composites in class II restorations.
Rocha Gomes Torres C; Rêgo HM; Perote LC; Santos LF; Kamozaki MB; Gutierrez NC; Di Nicoló R; Borges AB
J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):793-9. PubMed ID: 24769385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Artificial formed caries-like lesions around esthetic restorative materials.
Attar N; Onen A
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2002; 26(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11990054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative evaluation of four adhesive tooth coloured restorative materials. An invitro study.
Nayak UA; Sudha P; Vidya M
Indian J Dent Res; 2002; 13(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 12420568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Marginal adaptation to enamel of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in vivo.
van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P
Clin Oral Investig; 1997 Dec; 1(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 9555215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of four Class 5 restorative materials: 3-year recall.
Burgess JO; Gallo JR; Ripps AH; Walker RS; Ireland EJ
Am J Dent; 2004 Jun; 17(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 15301207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inhibition of artificial secondary caries in root by fluoride-releasing restorative materials.
Torii Y; Itota T; Okamoto M; Nakabo S; Nagamine M; Inoue K
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 11203775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
