These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11317778)

  • 21. Markov modeling of minimally invasive surgery based on tool/tissue interaction and force/torque signatures for evaluating surgical skills.
    Rosen J; Hannaford B; Richards CG; Sinanan MN
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 May; 48(5):579-91. PubMed ID: 11341532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Web-based VR training simulator for percutaneous rhizotomy.
    Li Y; Brodlie K; Phillips N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 70():175-81. PubMed ID: 10977535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Virtual environments for training critical skills in laparoscopic surgery.
    Downes M; Cavusoglu MC; Gantert W; Way LW; Tendick F
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 50():316-22. PubMed ID: 10180560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Objective surgical performance evaluation based on haptic feedback.
    Moody L; Baber C; Arvanitis TN
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 85():304-10. PubMed ID: 15458106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A framework for the design of a novel haptic-based medical training simulator.
    Tahmasebi AM; Hashtrudi-Zaad K; Thompson D; Abolmaesumi P
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2008 Sep; 12(5):658-66. PubMed ID: 18779081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The use of haptics in medical applications.
    Fager PJ; von Wowern P
    Int J Med Robot; 2004 Jun; 1(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 17520595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The realization of a haptic (force feedback) interface device for the purpose of angioplasty surgery simulation.
    Barnes SZ; Morr DR; Oggero E; Pagnacco G; Berme N
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1997; 33():19-24. PubMed ID: 9731329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Heuristic haptic texture for surgical simulations.
    Acosta E; Temkin B; Griswold JA; Deeb SA; Krummel T; Haluck RS; Kavoussi LR
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 85():14-6. PubMed ID: 15458053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sensible human projects: haptic modeling and surgical simulation based on measurements of practical patients with MR elastography--measurement of elastic modulus.
    Suga M; Matsuda T; Okamoto J; Takizawa O; Oshiro O; Minato K; Tsutsumi S; Nagata I; Sakai N; Takahashi T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 70():334-40. PubMed ID: 10977567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. CliniSpace: a multiperson 3D online immersive training environment accessible through a browser.
    Dev P; Heinrichs WL; Youngblood P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 163():173-9. PubMed ID: 21335784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Thin walled models for haptic and graphical rendering of soft tissues in surgical simulations.
    De S; Srinivasan MA
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 62():94-9. PubMed ID: 10538407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Verbal feedback from an expert is more effective than self-accessed feedback about motion efficiency in learning new surgical skills.
    Porte MC; Xeroulis G; Reznick RK; Dubrowski A
    Am J Surg; 2007 Jan; 193(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 17188099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Elastodynamic shape modeler: a tool for defining the deformation behavior of virtual tissues.
    Radetzky A; Nürnberger A; Pretschner DP
    Radiographics; 2000; 20(3):865-81. PubMed ID: 10835133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Measurement of in-vivo force response of intra-abdominal soft tissues for surgical simulation.
    Tay BK; Stylopoulos N; De S; Rattner DW; Srinivasan MA
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 85():514-9. PubMed ID: 15458143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Real-time soft tissue modelling for web-based surgical simulation: SurfaceChainMail.
    Li Y; Brodlie K; Phillips N
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 85():261-7. PubMed ID: 15458099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [An interactive and multimedia-based manual of surgical procedures: Webop--an approach to improve surgical education].
    Pape-Koehler C; Chmelik C; Aslund AM; Heiss MM
    Zentralbl Chir; 2010 Oct; 135(5):467-71. PubMed ID: 20976651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Generation of variable anatomical models for surgical training simulators.
    Sierra R; Zsemlye G; Székely G; Bajka M
    Med Image Anal; 2006 Apr; 10(2):275-85. PubMed ID: 16388975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The role of medical simulation: an overview.
    Kunkler K
    Int J Med Robot; 2006 Sep; 2(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 17520633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Surgical simulation: a urological perspective.
    Wignall GR; Denstedt JD; Preminger GM; Cadeddu JA; Pearle MS; Sweet RM; McDougall EM
    J Urol; 2008 May; 179(5):1690-9. PubMed ID: 18343441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Validation and learning in the Procedicus KSA virtual reality surgical simulator.
    Ström P; Kjellin A; Hedman L; Johnson E; Wredmark T; Felländer-Tsai L
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Feb; 17(2):227-31. PubMed ID: 12399848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.