These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11317820)

  • 1. Measuring in vivo animal soft tissue properties for haptic modeling in surgical simulation.
    Brouwer I; Ustin J; Bentley L; Sherman A; Dhruv N; Tendick F
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 81():69-74. PubMed ID: 11317820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Input and output for surgical simulation: devices to measure tissue properties in vivo and a haptic interface for laparoscopy simulators.
    Ottensmeyer MP; Ben-Ur E; Salisbury JK
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 70():236-42. PubMed ID: 10977548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In-vivo and in-situ compressive properties of porcine abdominal soft tissues.
    Brown JD; Rosen J; Kim YS; Chang L; Sinanan MN; Hannaford B
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 94():26-32. PubMed ID: 15455858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurement of in-vivo force response of intra-abdominal soft tissues for surgical simulation.
    Tay BK; Stylopoulos N; De S; Rattner DW; Srinivasan MA
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 85():514-9. PubMed ID: 15458143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical properties of abdominal organs in vivo and postmortem under compression loads.
    Rosen J; Brown JD; De S; Sinanan M; Hannaford B
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr; 130(2):021020. PubMed ID: 18412507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-controlled motorized endoscopic grasper for in vivo measurement of soft tissue biomechanical characteristics.
    Brown JD; Rosen J; Moreyra M; Sinanan M; Hannaford B
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 85():71-3. PubMed ID: 15458062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vivo measurement of solid organ visco-elastic properties.
    Ottensmeyer MP
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 85():328-33. PubMed ID: 15458110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vivo mechanical behavior of intra-abdominal organs.
    Tay BK; Kim J; Srinivasan MA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Nov; 53(11):2129-38. PubMed ID: 17073317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selective tessellation algorithm for modeling interactions between surgical instruments and tissues.
    Shen Y; Devarajan V; Eberhart R; Watson M; Butala J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 119():506-11. PubMed ID: 16404109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A surgical simulator for cleft lip planning and repair.
    Montgomery K; Sorokin A; Lionetti G; Schendel S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 94():204-9. PubMed ID: 15455894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An efficient soft tissue characterization algorithm from in vivo indentation experiments for medical simulation.
    Kim J; Ahn B; De S; Srinivasan MA
    Int J Med Robot; 2008 Sep; 4(3):277-85. PubMed ID: 18727148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spring: a general framework for collaborative, real-time surgical simulation.
    Montgomery K; Bruyns C; Brown J; Sorkin S; Mazzella F; Thonier G; Tellier A; Lerman B; Menon A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 85():296-303. PubMed ID: 15458105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Markov modeling of minimally invasive surgery based on tool/tissue interaction and force/torque signatures for evaluating surgical skills.
    Rosen J; Hannaford B; Richards CG; Sinanan MN
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2001 May; 48(5):579-91. PubMed ID: 11341532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Haptic rate for surgical manipulations with fingers and instruments.
    Kuroda Y; Nakao M; Kuroda T; Oshiro O
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 132():230-2. PubMed ID: 18391292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Graphic and haptic modelling of the oesophagus for VR-based medical simulation.
    Choi C; Kim J; Han H; Ahn B; Kim J
    Int J Med Robot; 2009 Sep; 5(3):257-66. PubMed ID: 19444793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling soft-tissue deformation prior to cutting for surgical simulation: finite element analysis and study of cutting parameters.
    Chanthasopeephan T; Desai JP; Lau AC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Mar; 54(3):349-59. PubMed ID: 17355046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An in vivo database model for pharmacological and physiological dosage for experimental animals.
    Gunes A; Ozturk Y; Babanli A
    Comput Biol Med; 2009 Jul; 39(7):590-4. PubMed ID: 19423091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measurement of the mechanical response of intra-abdominal organs of fresh human cadavers for use in surgical simulation.
    Lim YJ; Jones DB; Singh TP; De S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 119():322-7. PubMed ID: 16404070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Blue DRAGON--a system for monitoring the kinematics and the dynamics of endoscopic tools in minimally invasive surgery for objective laparoscopic skill assessment.
    Rosen J; Brown JD; Barreca M; Chang L; Hannaford B; Sinanan M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 85():412-8. PubMed ID: 15458124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A surgical simulator for planning and performing repair of cleft lips.
    Schendel S; Montgomery K; Sorokin A; Lionetti G
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2005 Aug; 33(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 15975810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.