344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11317837)
1. Selecting a sterilisation subcontractor.
Donawa M
Med Device Technol; 2001 Mar; 12(2):26-9. PubMed ID: 11317837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. ISO 11137, requirements for radiation sterilisation: current revisions.
Harries J
Med Device Technol; 2004 Apr; 15(3):20-1. PubMed ID: 15255532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethylene-oxide sterilisation aids speed to market.
Strain P; Young WT
Med Device Technol; 2004 Apr; 15(3):18-9. PubMed ID: 15255531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Practical experience of microbiological validation of sterilisation.
Harries J
Med Device Technol; 2003 Apr; 14(3):18-21. PubMed ID: 12789694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Avoiding unreasonable reliance on subcontractor certification.
Donawa ME
Med Device Technol; 1998 Dec; 9(10):9-12. PubMed ID: 10344878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How to respond to changes in the regulation of the ethylene-oxide sterilisation process.
Young WT
Med Device Technol; 2006 Apr; 17(3):12-5. PubMed ID: 16736657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sterilisation technology choices during. Product design and development.
Woolston J
Med Device Technol; 2001 Mar; 12(2):18-21. PubMed ID: 11317834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How to select a sterilisation process.
Turner M
Med Device Technol; 2001 Dec; 12(10):33-4. PubMed ID: 15966144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using and controlling subcontractors.
Burton W
Med Device Technol; 1997 Dec; 8(10):14-6. PubMed ID: 10176362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Roundtable Discussion: Elevating the Importance of Effective, Reliable Sterilization and Reprocessing.
Sheffer J; Basile R; Hendee S; Kwinn C; Prust J
Biomed Instrum Technol; 2017 Sept./Oct.; 51(5):414-422. PubMed ID: 28934567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimizing cost and service in sterilization.
Woolston J
Med Device Technol; 2000 May; 11(4):12-6. PubMed ID: 11010313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The advantages of contract sterilization.
Dietz GR
J Biomater Appl; 1995 Apr; 9(4):372-8. PubMed ID: 9309506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marketing medical devices in Japan.
Ohashi J
Med Device Technol; 1998; 9(1):32-3, 36-7. PubMed ID: 10176143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The quality planning conundrum.
Donawa ME
Med Device Technol; 1999; 10(6):14-6. PubMed ID: 10623345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. From sterile debate to burning issue: the economics and safety dichotomy.
Williams D
Med Device Technol; 2001 Mar; 12(2):8-11. PubMed ID: 11317844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Revised standards for sterilisation: the changes.
Hoxey E; Strain P; Harries J; Kirk B
Med Device Technol; 2007; 18(2):33-8. PubMed ID: 17494499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The economics of sterilization.
Brinston RM
Med Device Technol; 1995 Jun; 6(5):16-20, 22. PubMed ID: 10155389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical Device Technology sterilization survey.
Sash Pearson L
Med Device Technol; 1996 Mar; 7(2):58-64. PubMed ID: 10159870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetry for quality assurance in electron-beam sterilization of medical devices.
Mehta K; Kovács A; Miller A
Med Device Technol; 1993 May; 4(4):24-9. PubMed ID: 10148574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Battling biofilm. Do you know thine enemy?
Blecher M
Mater Manag Health Care; 2001 Dec; 10(12):22-4, 26. PubMed ID: 11799604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
