These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11317996)

  • 1. Use of a multicomponent treatment for food refusal.
    Kahng SW; Tarbox J; Wilke AE
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 11317996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using descriptive assessment in the treatment of bite acceptance and food refusal.
    Casey SD; Perrin CJ; Lesser AD; Perrin SH; Casey CL; Reed GK
    Behav Modif; 2009 Sep; 33(5):537-58. PubMed ID: 19675310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Behavioral assessment of feeding problems of individuals with severe disabilities.
    Munk DD; Repp AC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1994; 27(2):241-50. PubMed ID: 8063624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reinforcing efficacy of food on performance during pre- and postmeal sessions.
    Zhou L; Iwata BA; Shore BA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(4):411-4. PubMed ID: 12555913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment and treatment of problem behavior maintained by escape from attention and access to tangible items.
    Hagopian LP; Wilson DM; Wilder DA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(2):229-32. PubMed ID: 11421317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An alternative method of thinning reinforcer delivery during differential reinforcement.
    Roane HS; Fisher WW; Sgro GM; Falcomata TS; Pabico RR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2004; 37(2):213-8. PubMed ID: 15293640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reduction of unsafe eating in a patient with esophageal stricture.
    Shore BA; LeBlanc D; Simmons J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 10396776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of texture fading in the treatment of food selectivity.
    Shore BA; Babbitt RL; Williams KE; Coe DA; Snyder A
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(4):621-33. PubMed ID: 9891398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of extinction and reinforcement to increase food consumption and reduce expulsion.
    Coe DA; Babbitt RL; Williams KE; Hajimihalis C; Snyder AM; Ballard C; Efron LA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):581-3. PubMed ID: 9316264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Augmenting simplified habit reversal in the treatment of oral-digital habits exhibited by individuals with mental retardation.
    Long ES; Miltenberger RG; Ellingson SA; Ott SM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(3):353-65. PubMed ID: 10513029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of simultaneous presentation and differential reinforcement with response cost to reduce packing.
    Buckley SD; Newchok DK
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2005; 38(3):405-9. PubMed ID: 16270850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inappropriate mealtime behavior: the effects of noncontingent access to preferred tangibles on responding in functional analyses.
    González ML; Rubio EK; Taylor T
    Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Dec; 35(12):3655-64. PubMed ID: 25255166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of methylphenidate on a functional analysis of disruptive behavior: a replication and extension.
    Dicesare A; McAdam DB; Toner A; Varrell J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2005; 38(1):125-8. PubMed ID: 15898483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of response covariationamong multiple topographies of food refusal.
    Sevin BM; Gulotta CS; Sierp BJ; Rosica LA; Miller LJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 11936547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of dense-to-lean and fixed lean schedules of alternative reinforcement and extinction.
    Hagopian LP; Toole LM; Long ES; Bowman LG; Lieving GA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2004; 37(3):323-38. PubMed ID: 15529889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of component analyses to identify active variables in treatment packages for children with feeding disorders.
    Cooper LJ; Wacker DP; McComas JJ; Brown K; Peck SM; Richman D; Drew J; Frischmeyer P; Millard T
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1995; 28(2):139-53. PubMed ID: 7601802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Noncontingent reinforcement as treatment for food refusal and associated self-injury.
    Wilder DA; Normand M; Atwell J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2005; 38(4):549-53. PubMed ID: 16463536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combining stimulus fading, reinforcement, and extinction to treat food refusal.
    Freeman KA; Piazza CC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(4):691-4. PubMed ID: 9891407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of two differential reinforcement procedures with escape extinction to treat food refusal.
    Patel MR; Piazza CC; Martinez CJ; Volkert VM; Christine MS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(4):363-74. PubMed ID: 12555908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Descriptive analyses of pediatric food refusal and acceptance.
    Borrero CS; Woods JN; Borrero JC; Masler EA; Lesser AD
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2010 Mar; 43(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 20808496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.