These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11318052)

  • 1. The effects of acoustic mismatch and selective listening on repetition deafness.
    Soto-Faraco S; Sebastián-Gallés N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Apr; 27(2):356-69. PubMed ID: 11318052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Rönnberg J; Rudner M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):272-286. PubMed ID: 29923867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Repetition blindness: the effects of stimulus modality and spatial displacement.
    Kanwisher N; Potter MC
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 2927309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An auditory repetition deficit under low memory load.
    Soto-Faraco S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Feb; 26(1):264-78. PubMed ID: 10696617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Repetition blindness: out of sight or out of mind?
    Morris AL; Harris CL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):913-22. PubMed ID: 15462629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial modulation of repetition blindness and repetition deafness.
    Soto-Faraco S; Spence C
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Nov; 54(4):1181-202. PubMed ID: 11765739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repetition blindness depends on perceptual capture and token individuation failure.
    Hochhaus L; Marohn KM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 May; 17(2):422-32. PubMed ID: 1830085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Task difficulty differentially affects two measures of processing load: the pupil response during sentence processing and delayed cued recall of the sentences.
    Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 56(4):1156-65. PubMed ID: 23785182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A negative order-repetition priming effect: inhibition of order in unattended auditory sequences?
    Hughes R; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):199-218. PubMed ID: 12669758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual processing in dichotic listening.
    Massaro DW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1975 May; 2(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 1225941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determinants of repetition blindness.
    Park J; Kanwisher N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Jun; 20(3):500-19. PubMed ID: 8027712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repetition blindness: type recognition without token individuation.
    Kanwisher NG
    Cognition; 1987 Nov; 27(2):117-43. PubMed ID: 3691023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Postcategorical auditory distraction in short-term memory: Insights from increased task load and task type.
    Marsh JE; Yang J; Qualter P; Richardson C; Perham N; Vachon F; Hughes RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jun; 44(6):882-897. PubMed ID: 29389192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The limits of selective attention in tachistoscopic recognition.
    Butler B
    Can J Psychol; 1974 Jun; 28(2):199-213. PubMed ID: 4426009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Repetition blindness has a perceptual locus: evidence from online processing of targets in RSVP streams.
    Johnston JC; Hochhaus L; Ruthruff E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Apr; 28(2):477-89. PubMed ID: 11999868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Broken expectations: violation of expectancies, not novelty, captures auditory attention.
    Vachon F; Hughes RW; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):164-77. PubMed ID: 21895389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Forward and backward repetition blindness in speed and accuracy.
    Wong KF; Chen HC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):778-86. PubMed ID: 19485691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Manipulations of irrelevant information: suffix effects with articulatory suppression and irrelevant speech.
    Surprenant AM; LeCompte DC; Neath I
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):325-48. PubMed ID: 10881609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repetition suppression and reactivation in auditory-verbal short-term recognition memory.
    Buchsbaum BR; D'Esposito M
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Jun; 19(6):1474-85. PubMed ID: 18987393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.