These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11318053)

  • 1. Intentional and unintentional contributions to nonspecific preparation during reaction time foreperiods.
    Los SA; van den Heuvel CE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Apr; 27(2):370-86. PubMed ID: 11318053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The foreperiod effect revisited: conditioning as a basis for nonspecific preparation.
    Los SA; Knol DL; Boers RM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2001 Jan; 106(1-2):121-45. PubMed ID: 11256335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intentional and unintentional contributions to nonspecific preparation: electrophysiological evidence.
    Los SA; Heslenfeld DJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Feb; 134(1):52-72. PubMed ID: 15702963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sequential effects within a short foreperiod context: evidence for the conditioning account of temporal preparation.
    Steinborn MB; Rolke B; Bratzke D; Ulrich R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Oct; 129(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 18804193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamic adjustment of temporal preparation: shifting warning signal modality attenuates the sequential foreperiod effect.
    Steinborn MB; Rolke B; Bratzke D; Ulrich R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Sep; 132(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 19576562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of a cross-trial shift of auditory warning signals on the sequential foreperiod effect.
    Steinborn MB; Rolke B; Bratzke D; Ulrich R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):94-104. PubMed ID: 20096395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Foreperiod priming in temporal preparation: testing current models of sequential effects.
    Capizzi M; Correa A; Wojtowicz A; Rafal RD
    Cognition; 2015 Jan; 134():39-49. PubMed ID: 25460377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of response inhibition in temporal preparation: evidence from a go/no-go task.
    Los SA
    Cognition; 2013 Nov; 129(2):328-44. PubMed ID: 23969298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reweighting sequential effects across different distributions of foreperiods: segregating elementary contributions to nonspecific preparation.
    Los SA; Agter F
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Oct; 67(7):1161-70. PubMed ID: 16502838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relative durations of conditioned stimulus and intertrial interval in conditioned suppression.
    Coleman DA; Hemmes NS; Brown BL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 Jul; 46(1):51-66. PubMed ID: 3746188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissociating temporal preparation processes as a function of the inter-trial interval duration.
    Vallesi A; Lozano VN; Correa A
    Cognition; 2013 Apr; 127(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 23318351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
    Rodway P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Haloperidol can increase responding to both discrete and contextual cues in trace conditioned rats.
    Cassaday HJ; Nelson AJ; Norman C
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 158(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 15680192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effective time course of preparation.
    Los SA; Schut ML
    Cogn Psychol; 2008 Aug; 57(1):20-55. PubMed ID: 18255052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mental fatigue and temporal preparation in simple reaction-time performance.
    Langner R; Steinborn MB; Chatterjee A; Sturm W; Willmes K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jan; 133(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 19878913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A New Foreperiod Effect on Intertrial Phase Coherence. Part I: Existence and Behavioral Relevance.
    Rapela J; Westerfield M; Townsend J
    Neural Comput; 2018 Sep; 30(9):2348-2383. PubMed ID: 29949462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transfer effects in auditory temporal preparation occur using an unfilled but not filled foreperiod.
    Crowe EM; Los SA; Schindler L; Kent C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Aug; 74(8):1432-1438. PubMed ID: 33535929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intertrial unconditioned stimuli differentially impact trace conditioning.
    Williams DA; Todd TP; Chubala CM; Ludvig EA
    Learn Behav; 2017 Mar; 45(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 27495932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revisiting variable-foreperiod effects: evaluating the repetition priming account.
    Han T; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 May; 84(4):1193-1207. PubMed ID: 35391659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response specific temporal expectancy: evidence from a variable foreperiod paradigm.
    Thomaschke R; Kiesel A; Hoffmann J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2309-22. PubMed ID: 21755419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.