BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11318154)

  • 21. Flexible designs by adaptive plans of generalized Pocock- and O'Brien-Fleming-type and by self-designing clinical trials.
    Hartung J
    Biom J; 2006 Aug; 48(4):521-36. PubMed ID: 16972703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Power and sample size calculation incorporating misspecifications of the variance function in comparative clinical trials with over-dispersed count data.
    Igeta M; Takahashi K; Matsui S
    Biometrics; 2018 Dec; 74(4):1459-1467. PubMed ID: 29579337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Adaptive group sequential test for clinical trials with changing patient population.
    Feng H; Shao J; Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(6):1227-38. PubMed ID: 18027228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Information-based sample size re-estimation in group sequential design for longitudinal trials.
    Zhou J; Adewale A; Shentu Y; Liu J; Anderson K
    Stat Med; 2014 Sep; 33(22):3801-14. PubMed ID: 24797715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Conditional estimation using prior information in 2-stage group sequential designs assuming asymptotic normality when the trial terminated early.
    Shimura M; Maruo K; Gosho M
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Sep; 17(5):400-413. PubMed ID: 29687592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Implementing type I & type II error spending for two-sided group sequential designs.
    Rudser KD; Emerson SS
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 May; 29(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 17933592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stopping boundaries adjusted for sample size reestimation and negative stop.
    Shun Z
    J Biopharm Stat; 2002 Nov; 12(4):485-502. PubMed ID: 12477071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Bayesian predictive sample size selection design for single-arm exploratory clinical trials.
    Teramukai S; Daimon T; Zohar S
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4243-54. PubMed ID: 22807115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Planning and analyzing adaptive group sequential survival trials.
    Wassmer G
    Biom J; 2006 Aug; 48(4):714-29. PubMed ID: 16972724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Standard versus adaptive monitoring procedures: A commentary.
    Fleming TR
    Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(19):3305-12; discussion 3313-4, 3326-47. PubMed ID: 16850447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Design considerations in crossover trials with a single interim analysis and serial patient entry.
    Cook RJ; Willan AR
    Biometrics; 1996 Jun; 52(2):732-9. PubMed ID: 8672709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A review of methods for futility stopping based on conditional power.
    Lachin JM
    Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2747-64. PubMed ID: 16134130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. On efficient two-stage adaptive designs for clinical trials with sample size adjustment.
    Liu Q; Li G; Anderson KM; Lim P
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):617-40. PubMed ID: 22651105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sample size re-estimation in group-sequential response-adaptive clinical trials.
    Morgan CC
    Stat Med; 2003 Dec; 22(24):3843-57. PubMed ID: 14673942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A practical comparison of group-sequential and adaptive designs.
    Kelly PJ; Sooriyarachchi MR; Stallard N; Todd S
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(4):719-38. PubMed ID: 16022175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A self-designing rule for clinical trials with arbitrary response variables.
    Hartung J
    Control Clin Trials; 2001 Apr; 22(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 11306149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sample size adaptation in fixed-dose combination drug trial.
    James Hung HM; Wang SJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):679-86. PubMed ID: 22651108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Flexible two-stage design with sample size reassessment for survival trials.
    Desseaux K; Porcher R
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):5002-13. PubMed ID: 17577242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Optimization of adaptive designs: efficiency evaluation.
    Menon S; Chang M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):641-61. PubMed ID: 22651106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Group sequential tests for bivariate response: interim analyses of clinical trials with both efficacy and safety endpoints.
    Jennison C; Turnbull BW
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):741-52. PubMed ID: 8241370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.