BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11318164)

  • 21. A comparison of the generalized estimating equation approach with the maximum likelihood approach for repeated measurements.
    Park T
    Stat Med; 1993 Sep; 12(18):1723-32. PubMed ID: 8248664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bayes Factor Covariance Testing in Item Response Models.
    Fox JP; Mulder J; Sinharay S
    Psychometrika; 2017 Dec; 82(4):979-1006. PubMed ID: 28852944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Joint analysis of time-to-event and multiple binary indicators of latent classes.
    Larsen K
    Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 15032777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Jackknife estimators of variance for parameter estimates from estimating equations with applications to clustered survival data.
    Lipsitz SR; Dear KB; Zhao L
    Biometrics; 1994 Sep; 50(3):842-6. PubMed ID: 7981404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Latent variables, measurement error and methods for analysing longitudinal binary and ordinal data.
    Palta M; Lin CY
    Stat Med; 1999 Feb; 18(4):385-96. PubMed ID: 10070681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Some covariance models for longitudinal count data with overdispersion.
    Thall PF; Vail SC
    Biometrics; 1990 Sep; 46(3):657-71. PubMed ID: 2242408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Analysis of matched case-control data in presence of nonignorable missing exposure.
    Sinha S; Maiti T
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 17573865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Efficient parameter estimation in longitudinal data analysis using a hybrid GEE method.
    Leung DH; Wang YG; Zhu M
    Biostatistics; 2009 Jul; 10(3):436-45. PubMed ID: 19346528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Application of generalized estimating equations to a study of in vitro radiation sensitivity.
    Cologne JB; Carter RL; Fujita S; Ban S
    Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):927-34. PubMed ID: 8241379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Estimating equations for measures of association between repeated binary responses.
    Lipsitz SR; Fitzmaurice GM
    Biometrics; 1996 Sep; 52(3):903-12. PubMed ID: 8805760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares.
    Li CH
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):936-49. PubMed ID: 26174714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Latent class model diagnosis from a frequentist point of view.
    Formann AK
    Biometrics; 2003 Mar; 59(1):189-96; discussion 197-8. PubMed ID: 12762457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A probit latent class model with general correlation structures for evaluating accuracy of diagnostic tests.
    Xu H; Craig BA
    Biometrics; 2009 Dec; 65(4):1145-55. PubMed ID: 19210729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Regression analysis of longitudinal binary data with time-dependent environmental covariates: bias and efficiency.
    Schildcrout JS; Heagerty PJ
    Biostatistics; 2005 Oct; 6(4):633-52. PubMed ID: 15917376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Power and sample size determination in the Rasch model: evaluation of the robustness of a numerical method to non-normality of the latent trait.
    Guilleux A; Blanchin M; Hardouin JB; Sébille V
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e83652. PubMed ID: 24427276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Statistical analysis of illness-death processes and semicompeting risks data.
    Xu J; Kalbfleisch JD; Tai B
    Biometrics; 2010 Sep; 66(3):716-25. PubMed ID: 19912171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Multilevel latent class models with dirichlet mixing distribution.
    Di CZ; Bandeen-Roche K
    Biometrics; 2011 Mar; 67(1):86-96. PubMed ID: 20560936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Likelihood methods for incomplete longitudinal binary responses with incomplete categorical covariates.
    Lipsitz SR; Ibrahim JG; Fitzmaurice GM
    Biometrics; 1999 Mar; 55(1):214-23. PubMed ID: 11318157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Multiple imputation for high-dimensional mixed incomplete continuous and binary data.
    He R; Belin T
    Stat Med; 2014 Jun; 33(13):2251-62. PubMed ID: 24918245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.