These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11318442)

  • 21. A role for otoacoustic emissions in screening for hearing impairment and middle ear disorders in school-age children.
    Nozza RJ; Sabo DL; Mandel EM
    Ear Hear; 1997 Jun; 18(3):227-39. PubMed ID: 9201458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of age on click-evoked otoacoustic emission: A systematic review.
    Liu J; Wang N
    Neural Regen Res; 2012 Apr; 7(11):853-61. PubMed ID: 25737714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Tone burst-evoked otoacoustic emissions in cats with acoustic overstimulation and anoxia.
    Iwasaki S; Mizuta K; Hoshino T
    Hear Res; 1998 Apr; 118(1-2):83-9. PubMed ID: 9606063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Contralateral suppression of linear and nonlinear transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates at risk for hearing loss.
    Durante AS; Carvallo RM
    J Commun Disord; 2008; 41(1):70-83. PubMed ID: 17585930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cochlear receptor (microphonic and summating potentials, otoacoustic emissions) and auditory pathway (auditory brain stem potentials) activity in auditory neuropathy.
    Starr A; Sininger Y; Nguyen T; Michalewski HJ; Oba S; Abdala C
    Ear Hear; 2001 Apr; 22(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 11324847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [A clinical study about occupational noise-induced hearing loss measured and diagnosed with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions].
    Wang H; Jiang C; Zhou F; Wu P; Zhang S; Liu W; Huang Y
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Apr; 18(4):209-11. PubMed ID: 15318633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Function of the medial olivocochlear system in children with phonological disorders.
    Didoné DD; Kunst LR; Weich TM; Tochetto TM; Mota HB
    J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol; 2011 Dec; 23(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 22231057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [The relations between otoacoustic emissions and pure tone threshold].
    Chen J; Zheng Y; Li G; Meng Z
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Sep; 29(18):1591-7. PubMed ID: 26790255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Auditory function in normal-hearing, noise-exposed human ears.
    Stamper GC; Johnson TA
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):172-84. PubMed ID: 25350405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Otoacoustic emissions--an approach for monitoring aminoglycoside induced ototoxicity in children.
    Stavroulaki P; Apostolopoulos N; Dinopoulou D; Vossinakis I; Tsakanikos M; Douniadakis D
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1999 Nov; 50(3):177-84. PubMed ID: 10595663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of various durations of noise exposure on auditory brainstem response, distortion product otoacoustic emissions and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in rats.
    Fraenkel R; Freeman S; Sohmer H
    Audiol Neurootol; 2001; 6(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 11173774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Contralateral suppressions of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in diabetes mellitus patients].
    Cai Y
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Apr; 25(7):292-4. PubMed ID: 21710713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Possibility for quantitative and frequency-specific assessment of auditory threshold with otoacoustic emissions].
    Dreher A; Suckfüll M; Schneeweiss S; Schorn K
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 Jan; 76(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 9156504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of efferent acoustic reflex activation on psychoacoustical tuning curves in humans.
    Quaranta N; Scaringi A; Nahum S; Quaranta A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 May; 125(5):520-3. PubMed ID: 16092544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with cerebello-pontine angle tumor.
    Ferguson MA; O'Donoghue GM; Owen V
    Ear Hear; 2001 Jun; 22(3):173-81. PubMed ID: 11409853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Efferent suppression test--sensitivity and specificity].
    Lisowska G; Namysłowski G; Misiołek M; Scierski W; Orecka B; Czecior E; Dziendziel A
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2008; 62(6):747-54. PubMed ID: 19205524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The role of transient-evoked otoacoustic emission testing in the evaluation of elderly persons.
    Bertoli S; Probst R
    Ear Hear; 1997 Aug; 18(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 9288474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Contralateral frequency-modulated tones suppress transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Maison S; Micheyl C; Collet L
    Hear Res; 1998 Mar; 117(1-2):114-8. PubMed ID: 9557982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Does Contralateral Inhibition of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions Suggest Sex or Ear Laterality Effects?
    Stuart A; Kerls AN
    Am J Audiol; 2018 Sep; 27(3):272-282. PubMed ID: 29946686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.