These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11318446)

  • 21. [Importance of impedance audiometry on infant hearing screening test with otoacoustic emissions].
    Mata J; Rando I; Shepherd M; Miguélez J; Jiménez F; Delgado F
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2001 Mar; 52(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 11428277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Universal newborn hearing screening and transient evoked otoacoustic emission: new concepts in Brazil.
    Chapchap MJ; Segre CM
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 2001; (53):33-6. PubMed ID: 11409775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Long-term stability between click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs: A comparison.
    Hoshino M; Ueda H; Nakata S
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1999; 61(4):175-80. PubMed ID: 10450050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Otoacoustic emission criteria for neonatal hearing screening.
    Smyth V; McPherson B; Kei J; Young J; Tudehope D; Maurer M; Rankin G
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1999 Apr; 48(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10365967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Low-frequency otoacoustic emissions in schoolchildren measured by two commercial devices.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Piotrowska A; Kochanek K; Sliwa L; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Oct; 77(10):1724-8. PubMed ID: 23972827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Age influence in otoacoustic emissions for hearing loss screening in infants].
    Torrico P; Gómez C; López-Ríos J; de Cáceres MC; Trinidad G; Serrano M
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2004 Apr; 55(4):153-9. PubMed ID: 15359660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Otoacoustic emissions latency difference between full-term and preterm neonates.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Hatzopoulos S; Martini A; Blinowska KJ
    Hear Res; 2007 Sep; 231(1-2):54-62. PubMed ID: 17606343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Otoacoustic emissions in newborns evoked by 0.5kHz tone bursts.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Konopka W; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1522-6. PubMed ID: 26199137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Optimization of TEOAE recording protocols: a linear protocol derived from parameters of a time-frequency analysis: a pilot study on neonatal subjects.
    Hatzopoulos S; Cheng J; Grzanka A; Morlet T; Martini A
    Scand Audiol; 2000; 29(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 10718673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: a cornerstone for newborn hearing screening.
    Prieve BA
    Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):345. PubMed ID: 11059696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) recorded from neonates under 13 hours old using conventional and maximum length sequence (MLS) stimulation.
    de Boer J; Brennan S; Lineton B; Stevens J; Thornton AR
    Hear Res; 2007 Nov; 233(1-2):86-96. PubMed ID: 17850998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Screening strategies for neonatal hearing loss: which test is best?
    Dort JC; Tobolski C; Brown D
    J Otolaryngol; 2000 Aug; 29(4):206-10. PubMed ID: 11003070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Time-frequency distribution methods for the analysis of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Tognola G; Grandori F; Ravazzani P
    Technol Health Care; 1998 Sep; 6(2-3):159-75. PubMed ID: 9839862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of two methods of TEOAE recording in newborn hearing screening.
    Grandori F; Sergi P; Pastorino G; Uloziene I; Calo G; Ravazzani P; Tognola G; Parazzini M
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Jul; 41(5):267-70. PubMed ID: 12166685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A review of the effectiveness of otoacoustic emissions for evaluating hearing status after newborn screening.
    Janssen T
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1058-63. PubMed ID: 23628790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAEs) and newborn hearing screening: a feasibility and performance study].
    Pelosi G; Hatzopoulos S; Chierici R; Vigi V; Martini A
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2000 Aug; 20(4):237-44. PubMed ID: 11234441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [A combined neonatal hearing screening protocol].
    Almenar Latorre A; Tapia Toca MC; Fernández Pérez C; Moro Serrano M
    An Esp Pediatr; 2002 Jul; 57(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 12139894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Characteristics of transient otoacoustic emissions in patients with sudden idiopathic hearing loss.
    Truy E; Veuillet E; Collet L; Morgon A
    Br J Audiol; 1993 Dec; 27(6):379-85. PubMed ID: 8054895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Effects of intrauterine hypotrophy and perinatal hypoxia on cochlear function evaluated by click evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE)].
    Urbaniec N; Namysłowski G; Morawski K; Urbaniec P; Turecka L; Bazowska G
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2004; 58(2):365-72. PubMed ID: 15307486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of maturation on parameters used for pass/fail criteria in neonatal hearing screening programmes using evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Sadri M; Thornton AR; Kennedy CR
    Audiol Neurootol; 2007; 12(4):226-33. PubMed ID: 17389789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.