These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users. Donaldson GS; Kreft HA Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of prelingually or postlingually deafened adults who were using a single or multichannel cochlear implant. Hinderink JB; Snik AF; Mens LH; Brokx JP; van den Broek P Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Mar; 73(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 8205980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Amplitude Modulation Detection and Speech Recognition in Late-Implanted Prelingually and Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Users. De Ruiter AM; Debruyne JA; Chenault MN; Francart T; Brokx JP Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):557-66. PubMed ID: 25851075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changes in speech intelligibility of postlingually deaf adults after cochlear implantation. Gould J; Lane H; Vick J; Perkell JS; Matthies ML; Zandipour M Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):453-60. PubMed ID: 11770668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings. James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech-perception performance in prelingually deafened French children using the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant. Uziel AS; Reuillard-Artieres F; Sillon M; Vieu A; Mondain M; Piron JP; Tobey EA Am J Otol; 1996 Jul; 17(4):559-68. PubMed ID: 8841701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study. Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of dynamic range and amplitude mapping on phoneme recognition in Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users. Fu QJ; Shannon RV Ear Hear; 2000 Jun; 21(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 10890731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech dynamic range and its effect on cochlear implant performance. Zeng FG; Grant G; Niparko J; Galvin J; Shannon R; Opie J; Segel P J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):377-86. PubMed ID: 11831811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating the function of phonetic perceptual phenomena within speech recognition: an examination of the perception of /d/-/t/ by adult cochlear implant users. Iverson P J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):1056-64. PubMed ID: 12597198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patterns of phoneme perception errors by listeners with cochlear implants as a function of overall speech perception ability. Munson B; Donaldson GS; Allen SL; Collison EA; Nelson DA J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):925-35. PubMed ID: 12597186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Results of total deafness treatment in young pre- and postlingually deafened children. Szuchnik J; Skarzyński H; Geremek A; Zawadzki R Scand Audiol Suppl; 2001; (52):42-4. PubMed ID: 11318479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]