These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11318482)

  • 1. The effect of a multichannel cochlear implant on phoneme perception.
    Välimaa TT; Sorri MJ; Löppönen HJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 2001; (52):51-3. PubMed ID: 11318482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech perception and functional benefit after multichannel cochlear implantation.
    Välimaa TT; Sorri MJ; Löppönen HJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 2001; (52):45-7. PubMed ID: 11318480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phoneme recognition and confusions with multichannel cochlear implants: vowels.
    Välimaa TT; Määttä TK; Löppönen HJ; Sorri MJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Oct; 45(5):1039-54. PubMed ID: 12381059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech perception after multichannel cochlear implantation in Finnish-speaking postlingually deafened adults.
    Välimaa TT; Sorri MJ
    Scand Audiol; 2000; 29(4):276-83. PubMed ID: 11195948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phoneme recognition and confusions with multichannel cochlear implants: consonants.
    Välimaa TT; Määttä TK; Löppönen HJ; Sorri MJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Oct; 45(5):1055-69. PubMed ID: 12381060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Amplitude mapping and phoneme recognition in cochlear implant listeners.
    Zeng FG; Galvin JJ
    Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 10037066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of prelingually or postlingually deafened adults who were using a single or multichannel cochlear implant.
    Hinderink JB; Snik AF; Mens LH; Brokx JP; van den Broek P
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Mar; 73(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 8205980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Amplitude Modulation Detection and Speech Recognition in Late-Implanted Prelingually and Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Users.
    De Ruiter AM; Debruyne JA; Chenault MN; Francart T; Brokx JP
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):557-66. PubMed ID: 25851075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in speech intelligibility of postlingually deaf adults after cochlear implantation.
    Gould J; Lane H; Vick J; Perkell JS; Matthies ML; Zandipour M
    Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):453-60. PubMed ID: 11770668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech-perception performance in prelingually deafened French children using the nucleus multichannel cochlear implant.
    Uziel AS; Reuillard-Artieres F; Sillon M; Vieu A; Mondain M; Piron JP; Tobey EA
    Am J Otol; 1996 Jul; 17(4):559-68. PubMed ID: 8841701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting sequential bilateral cochlear implantation performance in postlingually deafened adults; A retrospective cohort study.
    Smulders YE; Hendriks T; Stegeman I; Eikelboom RH; Sucher C; Upson G; Chester Browne R; Jayakody D; Santa Maria PL; Atlas MD; Friedland PL
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2018 Dec; 43(6):1500-1507. PubMed ID: 30022607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects.
    Zwolan TA; Collins LM; Wakefield GH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Dec; 102(6):3673-85. PubMed ID: 9407659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
    Santarelli R; De Filippi R; Genovese E; Arslan E
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of dynamic range and amplitude mapping on phoneme recognition in Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users.
    Fu QJ; Shannon RV
    Ear Hear; 2000 Jun; 21(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 10890731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech dynamic range and its effect on cochlear implant performance.
    Zeng FG; Grant G; Niparko J; Galvin J; Shannon R; Opie J; Segel P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):377-86. PubMed ID: 11831811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the function of phonetic perceptual phenomena within speech recognition: an examination of the perception of /d/-/t/ by adult cochlear implant users.
    Iverson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):1056-64. PubMed ID: 12597198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patterns of phoneme perception errors by listeners with cochlear implants as a function of overall speech perception ability.
    Munson B; Donaldson GS; Allen SL; Collison EA; Nelson DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):925-35. PubMed ID: 12597186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Results of total deafness treatment in young pre- and postlingually deafened children.
    Szuchnik J; Skarzyński H; Geremek A; Zawadzki R
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 2001; (52):42-4. PubMed ID: 11318479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.