128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11318489)
1. Comparison of two digital hearing instrument fitting strategies.
Wesselkamp M; Margolf-Hackl S; Kiessling J
Scand Audiol Suppl; 2001; (52):73-5. PubMed ID: 11318489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is normal or less than normal overall loudness preferred by first-time hearing aid users?
Smeds K
Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):159-72. PubMed ID: 15064661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing loudness normalization (IHAFF) with speech intelligibility maximization (NAL-NL1) when implemented in a two-channel device.
Keidser G; Grant F
Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):501-15. PubMed ID: 11770672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Field trials using a digital hearing aid with active noise reduction and dual-microphone directionality.
Boymans M; Dreschler WA
Audiology; 2000; 39(5):260-8. PubMed ID: 11093610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 in Hearing Aids Fit to Children with Severe or Profound Hearing Loss: Goodness of Fit-to-Targets, Impacts on Predicted Loudness and Speech Intelligibility.
Ching TY; Quar TK; Johnson EE; Newall P; Sharma M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):260-74. PubMed ID: 25751694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of threshold-based fitting strategies for nonlinear hearing aids.
Stelmachowicz PG; Dalzell S; Peterson D; Kopun J; Lewis DL; Hoover BE
Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 9562535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adaptive fitting of hearing instruments by category loudness scaling (ScalAdapt).
Kiessling J; Schubert M; Archut A
Scand Audiol; 1996; 25(3):153-60. PubMed ID: 8881002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fitting hearing aids to individual loudness-perception measures.
Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 1996 Apr; 17(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 8698159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. I. Experienced users, fitted bilaterally.
Moore BC; Alcántara JI; Marriage J
Br J Audiol; 2001 Dec; 35(6):339-53. PubMed ID: 11848176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. III. Inexperienced versus experienced users.
Marriage J; Moore BC; Alcántara JI
Int J Audiol; 2004 Apr; 43(4):198-210. PubMed ID: 15250124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of linear gain and wide dynamic range compression hearing aid circuits: aided speech perception measures.
Jenstad LM; Seewald RC; Cornelisse LE; Shantz J
Ear Hear; 1999 Apr; 20(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 10229513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. II. Experienced users, fitted unilaterally.
Alcántara JI; Moore BC; Marriage J
Int J Audiol; 2004 Jan; 43(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 14974623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A digital filterbank hearing aid: three digital signal processing algorithms--user preference and performance.
Lunner T; Hellgren J; Arlinger S; Elberling C
Ear Hear; 1997 Oct; 18(5):373-87. PubMed ID: 9360861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A fitting strategy for digital hearing aids based on loudness and sound quality.
Pastoors AD; Gebhart TM; Kiessling J
Scand Audiol Suppl; 2001; (52):60-4. PubMed ID: 11318485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of a loudness model for hearing-aid fitting. I. Linear hearing aids.
Moore BC; Glasberg BR
Br J Audiol; 1998 Oct; 32(5):317-35. PubMed ID: 9845030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: II. Hearing aids with multi-channel compression.
Moore BC; Alcántara JI; Stone MA; Glasberg BR
Br J Audiol; 1999 Jun; 33(3):157-70. PubMed ID: 10439142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of linear gain and wide dynamic range compression hearing aid circuits II: aided loudness measures.
Jenstad LM; Pumford J; Seewald RC; Cornelisse LE
Ear Hear; 2000 Feb; 21(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 10708072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Threshold-based fitting methods for non-linear (WDRC) hearing instruments--comparison of acoustic characteristics.
Smeds K; Leijon A
Scand Audiol; 2001; 30(4):213-22. PubMed ID: 11845990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Children's speech perception and loudness ratings when fitted with hearing aids using the DSL v.4.1 and the NAL-NL1 prescriptions.
Scollie SD; Ching TY; Seewald RC; Dillon H; Britton L; Steinberg J; King K
Int J Audiol; 2010 Jan; 49 Suppl 1():S26-34. PubMed ID: 20109085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Clinical comparison of a digital with an analog hearing aid].
Meister H; Klüser H; Wolf A; Walger M; von Wedel H
HNO; 2000 Apr; 48(4):287-94. PubMed ID: 10810675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
