BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11319247)

  • 1. Foot orthosis prescription habits of Australian and New Zealand podiatric physicians.
    Landorf K; Keenan AM; Rushworth RL
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2001 Apr; 91(4):174-83. PubMed ID: 11319247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A survey of foot orthoses prescription habits amongst podiatrists in the UK, Australia and New Zealand.
    Chapman LS; Redmond AC; Landorf KB; Rome K; Keenan AM; Waxman R; Alcacer-Pitarch B; Siddle HJ; Backhouse MR
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2018; 11():64. PubMed ID: 30505351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Foot orthoses for people with rheumatoid arthritis: a survey of prescription habits among podiatrists.
    Chapman LS; Redmond AC; Landorf KB; Rome K; Keenan AM; Waxman R; Alcacer-Pitarch B; Siddle HJ; Backhouse MR
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2019; 12():7. PubMed ID: 30700994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Custom-made foot orthoses: an analysis of prescription characteristics from an Australian commercial orthotic laboratory.
    Menz HB; Allan JJ; Bonanno DR; Landorf KB; Murley GS
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2017; 10():23. PubMed ID: 28596806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consensus-based recommendations of Australian podiatrists for the prescription of foot orthoses for symptomatic flexible pes planus in adults.
    Banwell HA; Mackintosh S; Thewlis D; Landorf KB
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2014; 7(1):49. PubMed ID: 25558287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors influencing Australian podiatrists' behavioural intentions to adopt a smart insole into clinical practice: a mixed methods study.
    Macdonald EM; Perrin BM; Kingsley MIC
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2020 Jun; 13(1):28. PubMed ID: 32487234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Foot health service provision by the Australian Department of Veterans' Affairs: do major podiatric medical interventions reduce the number of maintenance treatments?
    Frescos N; Menz HB
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2007; 97(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 18024842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Orthoses in the treatment of rearfoot problems.
    Sobel E; Levitz SJ; Caselli MA
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 1999 May; 89(5):220-33. PubMed ID: 10349286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of podiatry service use for people with inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a review of a rheumatology podiatry clinic in Aotearoa New Zealand.
    Nguyen V; Brenton-Rule A; Dalbeth N; Rome K; Stewart S
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2022 May; 15(1):36. PubMed ID: 35578311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A patient satisfaction survey on prescription custom-molded foot orthoses.
    Walter JH; Ng G; Stoltz JJ
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2004; 94(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 15265995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in foot function with the use of Root and Blake orthoses.
    Reed L; Bennett PJ
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2001 Apr; 91(4):184-93. PubMed ID: 11319248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variations in the orthotic management of cerebral palsy.
    Morris C; Newdick H; Johnson A
    Child Care Health Dev; 2002 Mar; 28(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 11952649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Static stance response to different types of foot orthoses.
    Payne C; Oates M; Noakes H
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2003; 93(6):492-8. PubMed ID: 14623992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. National profile of foot orthotic provision in the United Kingdom, part 1: practitioners and scope of practice.
    Nester CJ; Graham A; Martinez-Santos A; Williams AE; McAdam J; Newton V
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2017; 10():35. PubMed ID: 28775767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Management of first metatarsophalangeal joint osteoarthritis by physical therapists and podiatrists in Australia and the United Kingdom: a cross-sectional survey of current clinical practice.
    Paterson KL; Hinman RS; Menz HB; Bennell KL
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2020 Mar; 13(1):14. PubMed ID: 32164759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Orthotic devices. Custom-made, prefabricated, and material selection.
    Buonomo LJ; Klein JS; Keiper TL
    Foot Ankle Clin; 2001 Jun; 6(2):249-52. PubMed ID: 11488053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A cross-sectional analysis of podiatrist-initiated review processes after issuing prescribed foot orthoses.
    Donnan L; Horn A; Baker E
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0276716. PubMed ID: 36315556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development and evaluation of prefabricated antipronation foot orthosis.
    Majumdar R; Laxton P; Thuesen A; Richards B; Liu A; Arán-Ais F; Parreño EM; Nester CJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(10):1331-42. PubMed ID: 24699969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A review of the theoretical unified approach to podiatric biomechanics in relation to foot orthoses therapy.
    Harradine P; Bevan L
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2009; 99(4):317-25. PubMed ID: 19605925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prescription pattern for orthoses in The Netherlands: use and experience in the ambulatory phase of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
    Bakker JP; De Groot IJ; De Jong BA; Van Tol-De Jager MA; Lankhorst GJ
    Disabil Rehabil; 1997 Aug; 19(8):318-25. PubMed ID: 9279487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.