These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11320872)

  • 1. [Psychoacoustic scaling of acoustic voice parameters by multicenter voice ratings].
    Schönweiler R; Wübbelt P; Hess M; Ptok M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2001 Mar; 80(3):117-22. PubMed ID: 11320872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Novel approach to acoustical voice analysis using artificial neural networks.
    Schönweiler R; Hess M; Wübbelt P; Ptok M
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2000 Dec; 1(4):270-82. PubMed ID: 11547807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Perceptual and acoustic evaluation of hoarseness].
    Hanschmann H; Berger R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2011 Feb; 90(2):68-70. PubMed ID: 21298598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Voice quality of prepubescent children with quiescent recurrent respiratory papillomatosis.
    Lindman JP; Gibbons MD; Morlier R; Wiatrak BJ
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 May; 68(5):529-36. PubMed ID: 15081224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual evaluation of voice quality and its correlation with acoustic measurements.
    Bhuta T; Patrick L; Garnett JD
    J Voice; 2004 Sep; 18(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 15331102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Characteristics of the voice in patients with glottic carcinoma evaluated with the RBH (Roughness, Breathiness, Hoarseness) and GIRBAS (Grade, Instability, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain) scales].
    Mitrović S
    Med Pregl; 2003; 56(7-8):337-40. PubMed ID: 14587250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differentiated perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements.
    Dejonckere PH; Remacle M; Fresnel-Elbaz E; Woisard V; Crevier-Buchman L; Millet B
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1996; 117(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 9102729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Subjective acoustic analysis of dysphonia caused by tumor using the RBH (roughness, breathiness, hoarseness) scale].
    Mitrović S
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2003; 131(1-2):40-2. PubMed ID: 14608861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Voice abnormalities and their relation with motor dysfunction in Parkinson's disease.
    Midi I; Dogan M; Koseoglu M; Can G; Sehitoglu MA; Gunal DI
    Acta Neurol Scand; 2008 Jan; 117(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 18031561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of visible speech in the perceptual rating of pathological voices.
    Martens JW; Versnel H; Dejonckere PH
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Feb; 133(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 17309988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Artificial neural network-based classification to screen for dysphonia using psychoacoustic scaling of acoustic voice features.
    Linder R; Albers AE; Hess M; Pöppl SJ; Schönweiler R
    J Voice; 2008 Mar; 22(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 17074463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustical and Perceptual Voice Profiling of Children With Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis.
    Verma H; Solanki P; James M
    J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):600-5. PubMed ID: 26474713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgments of dysphonic voice.
    Eadie TL; Baylor CR
    J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):527-44. PubMed ID: 16324823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability and confidence in using a paired comparison paradigm in perceptual voice quality evaluation.
    Yiu EM; Chan KM; Mok RS
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2007 Feb; 21(2):129-45. PubMed ID: 17364621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Perceptive and instrumental examination of voice quality in patients with lip-jaw-palate clefts].
    Bressmann T; Sader R; Merk M; Ziegler W; Busch R; Zeilhofer HF; Horch HH
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Dec; 77(12):700-8. PubMed ID: 10036673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Functional outcome of vocal fold medialization thyroplasty with a hydroxyapatite implant.
    Storck C; Brockmann M; Schnellmann E; Stoeckli SJ; Schmid S
    Laryngoscope; 2007 Jun; 117(6):1118-22. PubMed ID: 17417108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term voice and swallowing modifications after supracricoid laryngectomy: objective, subjective, and self-assessment data.
    Schindler A; Favero E; Nudo S; Albera R; Schindler O; Cavalot AL
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2006; 27(6):378-83. PubMed ID: 17084220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automatic Evaluation of Voice Quality Using Text-Based Laryngograph Measurements and Prosodic Analysis.
    Haderlein T; Schwemmle C; Döllinger M; Matoušek V; Ptok M; Nöth E
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2015; 2015():316325. PubMed ID: 26136813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acoustic investigation of vocal quality following treatment for childhood cerebellar tumour.
    Cornwell PL; Murdoch BE; Ward EC; Kellie S
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2004; 56(2):93-107. PubMed ID: 15001825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Preliminary study of acoustic and aerodynamic parameters after Tucker frontal anterior laryngectomy].
    Giovanni A; Robert D; Teston B; Guarella MD; Zanaret M
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1996; 113(5):277-84. PubMed ID: 9124768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.