These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1132266)

  • 1. The effects of stimulus complexity and sensory modality on reaction time in normal and retarded readers.
    Blank M; Berenzweig SS; Bridger SH
    Child Dev; 1975 Mar; 46(1):133-40. PubMed ID: 1132266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitivity to visual and auditory stimuli in children with developmental dyslexia.
    King B; Wood C; Faulkner D
    Dyslexia; 2008 May; 14(2):116-41. PubMed ID: 17937386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Behavioral and ERP evidence for amodal sluggish attentional shifting in developmental dyslexia.
    Lallier M; Tainturier MJ; Dering B; Donnadieu S; Valdois S; Thierry G
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Dec; 48(14):4125-35. PubMed ID: 20933526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is developmental dyslexia modality specific? A visual-auditory comparison of Italian dyslexics.
    Marinelli CV; Angelelli P; Di Filippo G; Zoccolotti P
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1718-29. PubMed ID: 21382386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Matching of auditory and visual stimuli by average and retarded readers.
    Beery JW
    Child Dev; 1967 Sep; 38(3):827-33. PubMed ID: 6049644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of audiovisual integration in normal and retarded readers.
    Voort LV; Senf GM; Benton AL
    Child Dev; 1972 Dec; 43(4):1260-72. PubMed ID: 4643771
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decision-time measures of sequential processing by mentally retarded and nonretarded adolescents and MA-matched children.
    Holden EA; Corrigan JG
    Am J Ment Defic; 1983 May; 87(6):640-8. PubMed ID: 6869422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of script on poor readers' sensitivity to dynamic visual stimuli.
    Kim J; Davis C; Burnham D; Luksaneeyanawin S
    Brain Lang; 2004 Dec; 91(3):326-35. PubMed ID: 15533558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual, auditory and cross-modal processing of linguistic and nonlinguistic temporal patterns among adult dyslexic readers.
    Meyler A; Breznitz Z
    Dyslexia; 2005 May; 11(2):93-115. PubMed ID: 15918369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory-visual and sequential-spatial matching in relation to reading ability.
    Bryden MP
    Child Dev; 1972 Sep; 43(3):824-32. PubMed ID: 5056610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A systematic investigation of the functional neuroanatomy of auditory and visual phonological processing.
    Burton MW; Locasto PC; Krebs-Noble D; Gullapalli RP
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(3):647-61. PubMed ID: 15955475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does a sensory processing deficit explain counting accuracy on rapid visual sequencing tasks in adults with and without dyslexia?
    Conlon EG; Wright CM; Norris K; Chekaluk E
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Jun; 76(1):197-205. PubMed ID: 21435770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory perceptual grouping and attention in dyslexia.
    Petkov CI; O'connor KN; Benmoshe G; Baynes K; Sutter ML
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 24(2):343-54. PubMed ID: 15993772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Irrelevant visual stimuli improve auditory task performance.
    Thorne JD; Debener S
    Neuroreport; 2008 Mar; 19(5):553-7. PubMed ID: 18388737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Task-dependent modulation of neglect dyslexia? Novel evidence from the viewing position effect.
    Stenneken P; van Eimeren L; Keller I; Jacobs AM; Kerkhoff G
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1189():166-78. PubMed ID: 18054900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integrating motion information across sensory modalities: the role of top-down factors.
    Soto-Faraco S; Kingstone A; Spence C
    Prog Brain Res; 2006; 155():273-86. PubMed ID: 17027394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of retarded and normal readers on a visual-auditory learning task with and without reinforcers.
    Lyle JG; Goyen JD
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Feb; 38(1):199-204. PubMed ID: 4815493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An attempt to simulate letter-by-letter dyslexia in normal readers.
    Fiset S; Arguin M; Fiset D
    Brain Lang; 2006 Sep; 98(3):251-63. PubMed ID: 16781767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.