74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11323450)
1. Comparison of two software versions for assessment of body-composition analysis by DXA.
Vozarova B; Wang J; Weyer C; Tataranni PA
Obes Res; 2001 Mar; 9(3):229-32. PubMed ID: 11323450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The intra- and inter-instrument reliability of DXA based on ex vivo soft tissue measurements.
Guo Y; Franks PW; Brookshire T; Antonio Tataranni P
Obes Res; 2004 Dec; 12(12):1925-9. PubMed ID: 15687392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of body composition by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and two different software packages.
Van Loan MD; Keim NL; Berg K; Mayclin PL
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1995 Apr; 27(4):587-91. PubMed ID: 7791591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of tissue depth and composition on the performance of the Lunar dual-energy X-ray absorptiometer whole-body scanning mode.
Laskey MA; Lyttle KD; Flaxman ME; Barber RW
Eur J Clin Nutr; 1992 Jan; 46(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 1559506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fat mass measured by DXA varies with scan velocity.
Black E; Petersen L; Kreutzer M; Toubro S; Sørensen TI; Pedersen O; Astrup A
Obes Res; 2002 Feb; 10(2):69-77. PubMed ID: 11836451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Body composition analysis by dual X-ray absorptiometry: in vivo and in vitro comparison of three different fan-beam instruments.
Aasen G; Fagertun H; Halse J
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2006; 66(8):659-66. PubMed ID: 17101558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry machines for measuring fat distribution changes of HIV-associated lipodystrophy.
Yang Y; Zhu WD; Paton NI
Antivir Ther; 2004 Oct; 9(5):771-8. PubMed ID: 15535415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Body composition in a seasonal model of obesity: longitudinal measures and validation of DXA.
Hunter HL; Nagy TR
Obes Res; 2002 Nov; 10(11):1180-7. PubMed ID: 12429883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of body weight and composition measured by two different dual energy X-ray absorptiometry devices and three acquisition modes in obese women.
Genton L; Karsegard VL; Zawadynski S; Kyle UG; Pichard C; Golay A; Hans DB
Clin Nutr; 2006 Jun; 25(3):428-37. PubMed ID: 16375994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for determining in vivo body composition of chickens.
Swennen Q; Janssens GP; Geers R; Decuypere E; Buyse J
Poult Sci; 2004 Aug; 83(8):1348-57. PubMed ID: 15339010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of three bioelectrical impedance methods with DXA in overweight and obese men.
Pateyjohns IR; Brinkworth GD; Buckley JD; Noakes M; Clifton PM
Obesity (Silver Spring); 2006 Nov; 14(11):2064-70. PubMed ID: 17135624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Between-centre variability versus variability over time in DXA whole body measurements evaluated using a whole body phantom.
Louis O; Verlinde S; Thomas M; De Schepper J
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):431-4. PubMed ID: 16513312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences in whole body measurements by DXA-scanning using two Lunar DPX-L machines.
Lantz H; Samuelson G; Bratteby LE; Mallmin H; Sjöström L
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1999 Jul; 23(7):764-70. PubMed ID: 10454112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reproducibility of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry total and regional body composition measurements using different scanning positions and definitions of regions.
Lohman M; Tallroth K; Kettunen JA; Marttinen MT
Metabolism; 2009 Nov; 58(11):1663-8. PubMed ID: 19632696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is discordance in bone measurements affected by body composition or anthropometry? A comparative study between peripheral and central devices.
Saarelainen J; Rikkonen T; Honkanen R; Kröger H; Tuppurainen M; Niskanen L; Jurvelin JS
J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(3):312-8. PubMed ID: 17451985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a phantom for morphometric X-ray absorptiometry.
Rea JA; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Br J Radiol; 2001 Apr; 74(880):341-50. PubMed ID: 11387153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Percentage fat in overweight and obese children: comparison of DXA and air displacement plethysmography.
Radley D; Gately PJ; Cooke CB; Carroll S; Oldroyd B; Truscott JG
Obes Res; 2005 Jan; 13(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 15761165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of indexing resting metabolic rate against fat-free mass determined by different body composition models.
LaForgia J; van der Ploeg GE; Withers RT; Gunn SM; Brooks AG; Chatterton BE
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2004 Aug; 58(8):1132-41. PubMed ID: 15054426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New bioimpedance analysis system: improved phenotyping with whole-body analysis.
Pietrobelli A; Rubiano F; St-Onge MP; Heymsfield SB
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2004 Nov; 58(11):1479-84. PubMed ID: 15138459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Total and regional fat and serum cardiovascular disease risk factors in lean and obese children and adolescents.
Teixeira PJ; Sardinha LB; Going SB; Lohman TG
Obes Res; 2001 Aug; 9(8):432-42. PubMed ID: 11500523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
