335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11323475)
1. Short-term follow-up results in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography.
Vizcaíno I; Gadea L; Andreo L; Salas D; Ruiz-Perales F; Cuevas D; Herranz C; Bueno F;
Radiology; 2001 May; 219(2):475-83. PubMed ID: 11323475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study.
Fajardo LL; Pisano ED; Caudry DJ; Gatsonis CA; Berg WA; Connolly J; Schnitt S; Page DL; McNeil BJ;
Acad Radiol; 2004 Mar; 11(3):293-308. PubMed ID: 15035520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Critical review of 215 cases of non-palpable mammary lesions].
Pastore G; Marano P; Romani M; Costantini M; Belli P
Radiol Med; 1999 May; 97(5):344-8. PubMed ID: 10432964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Radiology of nonpalpable breast lesions].
Vega A; Nava E; Ortega E; Garijo F
Rev Med Univ Navarra; 1995; 39(4):11-7. PubMed ID: 9499837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted?
Graf O; Helbich TH; Fuchsjaeger MH; Hopf G; Morgun M; Graf C; Mallek R; Sickles EA
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):850-6. PubMed ID: 15486217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Short-term recall for 'probably benign' mammographic lesions detected in a three yearly screening programme.
Dawson JS; Wilson AR
Clin Radiol; 1994 Jun; 49(6):391-5. PubMed ID: 8045062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness of assigning BI-RADS category-3 to breast lesion with respect to follow-up.
Masroor I
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Apr; 18(4):209-12. PubMed ID: 18474152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Role of US-guided fine-needle aspiration with on-site cytopathologic evaluation in management of nonpalpable breast lesions.
Buchbinder SS; Gurell DS; Tarlow MM; Salvatore M; Suhrland MJ; Kader K
Acad Radiol; 2001 Apr; 8(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 11293780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stereotactic core-needle biopsy of non-mass calcifications: outcome and accuracy at long-term follow-up.
Han BK; Choe YH; Ko YH; Nam SJ; Kim JH; Yang JH
Korean J Radiol; 2003; 4(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 14726638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is stereotactic large-core needle biopsy beneficial prior to surgical treatment in BI-RADS 5 lesions?
Hoorntje LE; Peeters PH; Mali WP; Borel Rinkes IH
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Jul; 86(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 15319568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Solid nonpalpable breast lesions. Success and failure of guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in a consecutive series of 2444 cases.
Ciatto S; Rosselli Del Turco M; Ambrogetti D; Bravetti P; Catarzi S; Morrone D; Cariaggi MP
Acta Radiol; 1997 Sep; 38(5):815-20. PubMed ID: 9332236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Malignancy in ACR 3 category mammographic lesions, masses and calcifications].
Travade A; Isnard A; Bagard C; Bouchet F
J Radiol; 2004 Dec; 85(12 Pt 2):2111-22. PubMed ID: 15692428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nonpalpable breast lesions: recommendations for biopsy based on suspicion of carcinoma at mammography.
Hall FM; Storella JM; Silverstone DZ; Wyshak G
Radiology; 1988 May; 167(2):353-8. PubMed ID: 3282256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stereotactic core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions using a conventional mammography unit with an add-on device.
Kirshenbaum KJ; Voruganti T; Overbeeke C; Kirshenbaum MD; Patel P; Kaplan G; Maker V; August C; Cavallino RP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Aug; 181(2):527-31. PubMed ID: 12876040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The significance of mammographic calcifications in early breast cancer detection.
Rosselli Del Turco M; Ciatto S; Bravetti P; Pacini P
Radiol Med; 1986; 72(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 3008222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The predictive value of needle localization mammographically assisted biopsy of the breast.
Senofsky GM; Davies RJ; Olson L; Skully P; Olshen R
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1990 Nov; 171(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 2237718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial.
Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C; Panizza P; Del Frate C; Soldano F; Isola M; Sardanelli F; Giuseppetti GM; Simonetti G; Lattanzio V; Del Maschio A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1723-32. PubMed ID: 16714666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The contribution of ultrasonography to the differential diagnosis of breast cancer.
Ciatto S; Rosselli del Turco M; Catarzi S; Morrone D
Neoplasma; 1994; 41(6):341-5. PubMed ID: 7870218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tl-201 scintigraphy, mammography and ultrasonography in the evaluation of palpable and nonpalpable breast lesions: a correlative study.
Ozdemir A; Oznur II; Vural G; Atasever T; Karabacak NI; Gökçora N; Işik S; Unlü M
Eur J Radiol; 1997 Feb; 24(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 9097057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Palpable breast masses with probably benign morphology at sonography: can biopsy be deferred?
Park YM; Kim EK; Lee JH; Ryu JH; Han SS; Choi SJ; Lee SJ; Yoon HK
Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1104-11. PubMed ID: 18855166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
