These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11324025)
1. Student and faculty perceptions in the assessment of amalgam restorations. Owens BM J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2000; 80(2):28-31. PubMed ID: 11324025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of finishing and polishing procedures on the decision to replace old amalgam restorations: an in vitro study. Oleinisky JC; Baratieri LN; Ritter AV; Felipe LA; de Freitas SF Quintessence Int; 1996 Dec; 27(12):833-40. PubMed ID: 9452677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of finishing and polishing on the decision to replace existing amalgam restorations. Cardoso M; Baratieri LN; Ritter AV Quintessence Int; 1999 Jun; 30(6):413-8. PubMed ID: 10635277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Repair or replacement of amalgam restorations: decisions at a USA and a UK dental school. Setcos JC; Khosravi R; Wilson NH; Shen C; Yang M; Mjör IA Oper Dent; 2004; 29(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 15279477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of a training program on the reliability of examiners evaluating amalgam restorations. Robertello FJ; Pink FE Oper Dent; 1997; 22(2):57-65. PubMed ID: 9484162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cumulative assessment of factors leading to restorative decisions in an educational environment. A graphical demonstration using an in vitro case. Maupomé G Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):336-43. PubMed ID: 11203840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dental students' ability to assess their performance in a preclinical restorative course: comparison of students' and faculty members' assessments. Tuncer D; Arhun N; Yamanel K; Çelik Ç; Dayangaç B J Dent Educ; 2015 Jun; 79(6):658-64. PubMed ID: 26034030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of a short training program on the clinical examination of dental restorations. McAndrew R; Chadwick B; Treasure ET Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 21702675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Examiner agreement in the replacement decision of Class I amalgam restorations. Ermis RB; Aydin U J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 May; 5(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 15150636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Removal, replacement and placement of amalgam restorations by Ontario dentists in 2002. Adegbembo AO; Watson PA J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):565. PubMed ID: 16202194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intra- and inter-examiner variability in evaluating preclinical pediatric dentistry operative procedures. Sharaf AA; AbdelAziz AM; El Meligy OA J Dent Educ; 2007 Apr; 71(4):540-4. PubMed ID: 17468316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Change in size of replaced amalgam restorations: a methodological study. Mjör IA; Reep RL; Kubilis PS; Mondragón BE Oper Dent; 1998; 23(5):272-7. PubMed ID: 9863449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Repair or replacement of restorations: do we accept built in obsolescence or do we improve the evidence? Sharif MO; Fedorowicz Z; Tickle M; Brunton PA Br Dent J; 2010 Aug; 209(4):171-4. PubMed ID: 20798721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of two dental simulation systems: virtual reality versus contemporary non-computer-assisted. Jasinevicius TR; Landers M; Nelson S; Urbankova A J Dent Educ; 2004 Nov; 68(11):1151-62. PubMed ID: 15520234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of dental students as instructors in preclinical prosthodontics and occlusion courses. Nimmo A; Mitchell GS; Penfield RD; Hall A J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(5):400-5. PubMed ID: 17672831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]