These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11324845)

  • 21. New version of the TEN test with calibrations in dB HL.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):478-87. PubMed ID: 15599194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of ipsilateral and contralateral low-frequency narrow-band noise on temporary threshold shift in humans.
    Quaranta A; Scaringi A; Fernandez-Vega S; Quaranta N
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2003 Jan; 123(2):164-7. PubMed ID: 12701733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Extended high-frequency audiometry--reproducibility of two type of earphones].
    Schmuziger N; Gantenbein M; Smurzynski J; Bertoli S; Probst R
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 2000; Suppl 125():75S-76S. PubMed ID: 11141946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of inter-aural attenuation with the Etymotic ER-3A insert earphone and the Telephonics TDH-39 supra-aural earphone.
    Munro KJ; Agnew N
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Aug; 33(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 10509860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Mills DM; Feeney MP; Gates GA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reference hearing thresholds in an extended frequency range as a function of age.
    Jilek M; Šuta D; Syka J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Oct; 136(4):1821-30. PubMed ID: 25324083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Longitudinal study of pure-tone thresholds in older persons.
    Lee FS; Matthews LJ; Dubno JR; Mills JH
    Ear Hear; 2005 Feb; 26(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 15692300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reference equivalent threshold levels for pure tones and 1/3-oct noise bands: insert earphone and TDH-49 earphone.
    Cox RM; McDaniel DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):443-6. PubMed ID: 3950196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Repeatability of high-frequency thresholds.
    Frank T; Dreisbach LE
    Ear Hear; 1991 Aug; 12(4):294-5. PubMed ID: 1783231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Equivalent hearing threshold levels for the RadioEar IP30 insert earphone and short-term stimuli: comparison of peak-equivalent and RMS-based measures.
    Fedtke T; Bug MU
    Int J Audiol; 2020 May; 59(5):398-402. PubMed ID: 31657255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of audiometric threshold shift criteria for ototoxicity monitoring.
    Konrad-Martin D; James KE; Gordon JS; Reavis KM; Phillips DS; Bratt GW; Fausti SA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 May; 21(5):301-14; quiz 357. PubMed ID: 20569665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reference hearing threshold levels for short duration signals.
    Poulsen T; Legarth SV
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Oct; 47(10):665-74. PubMed ID: 18923987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Predicting the degree of hearing loss using click auditory brainstem response in babies referred from newborn hearing screening.
    Baldwin M; Watkin P
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):361-9. PubMed ID: 23340456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An evaluation of the Sennheiser HDA 280-CL circumaural headphone for use in audiometric testing.
    Folkeard P; Hawkins M; Scollie S; Sheikh B; Parsa V
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Jul; 58(7):427-433. PubMed ID: 30957582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A new approach to serial monitoring of ultra-high frequency hearing.
    Feghali JG; Bernstein RS
    Laryngoscope; 1991 Aug; 101(8):825-9. PubMed ID: 1865730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reliability of the Home Hearing Test: Implications for Public Health.
    Mosley CL; Langley LM; Davis A; McMahon CM; Tremblay KL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):208-216. PubMed ID: 30461396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A version of the TEN Test for use with ER-3A insert earphones.
    Moore BC; Creeke S; Glasberg BR; Stone MA; Sek A
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):554-7. PubMed ID: 22436409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An assessment of threshold shifts in nonprofessional pop/rock musicians using conventional and extended high-frequency audiometry.
    Schmuziger N; Patscheke J; Probst R
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):643-8. PubMed ID: 17804978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The equivalent threshold sound pressure levels and test-retest threshold variability of a consumer-grade insert earphone fitted with stock, foam, and otoacoustic emission probe ear tips.
    Seluakumaran K; Kamal Azizi A; Kulasegarah J
    Int J Audiol; 2024 Jul; 63(7):551-559. PubMed ID: 37139683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. High-frequency audiometry using precision earphones: reliability under laboratory and field conditions.
    Ising H; Babisch W; Dziombowski D; von Arentsschild O; Fischer R
    Audiology; 1986; 25(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 3954679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.