These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11324845)

  • 41. Behavioral hearing thresholds between 0.125 and 20 kHz using depth-compensated ear simulator calibration.
    Lee J; Dhar S; Abel R; Banakis R; Grolley E; Lee J; Zecker S; Siegel J
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):315-29. PubMed ID: 22436407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Relative risk of elevated hearing threshold compared to ISO1999 normative populations for Royal Australian Air Force male personnel.
    Guest M; Boggess M; Attia J;
    Hear Res; 2012 Mar; 285(1-2):65-76. PubMed ID: 22326290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. High-frequency audiometric monitoring strategies for early detection of ototoxicity.
    Fausti SA; Larson VD; Noffsinger D; Wilson RH; Phillips DS; Fowler CG
    Ear Hear; 1994 Jun; 15(3):232-9. PubMed ID: 8076721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Hearing in nonprofessional pop/rock musicians.
    Schmuziger N; Patscheke J; Probst R
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 16825883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Minimal response levels for visual reinforcement audiometry in infants.
    Parry G; Hacking C; Bamford J; Day J
    Int J Audiol; 2003 Oct; 42(7):413-7. PubMed ID: 14582637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Extended high-frequency thresholds in college students: effects of music player use and other recreational noise.
    Le Prell CG; Spankovich C; Lobariñas E; Griffiths SK
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Sep; 24(8):725-39. PubMed ID: 24131608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The Nord-Trøndelag Norway Audiometric Survey 1996-98: unscreened thresholds and prevalence of hearing impairment for adults > 20 years.
    Borchgrevink HM; Tambs K; Hoffman HJ
    Noise Health; 2005; 7(28):1-15. PubMed ID: 16417702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Effects of occupational noise exposure on asymmetric hearing loss in automobile manufacturing workers].
    Chen YL; Wang X; Liu XX; Han F; Kang N; Hu WJ
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2019 Apr; 37(4):260-264. PubMed ID: 31177690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Comparison of thresholds acquired with SVR and PTA in normal hearing subjects].
    Liu H; Zhu GY; Yang XP; Zhou XR; Wan L; Fan LH
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Feb; 26(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 20232737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Study the impacts of diagnosis on occupational noise-induced deafness after bring into the different high frequency hearing threshold weighted value].
    Xue LJ; Yang AC; Chen H; Huang WX; Guo JJ; Liang XY; Chen ZQ; Zheng QL
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 35(11):812-817. PubMed ID: 29316750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effects of background noise on earphone thresholds.
    Frank T; Williams DL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 May; 4(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 8318711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluation of the Repeatability and Accuracy of the Wideband Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference.
    Vaisberg JM; Folkeard P; Pumford J; Narten P; Scollie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jun; 29(6):520-532. PubMed ID: 29863466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. An individualized, sensitive frequency range for early detection of ototoxicity.
    Fausti SA; Henry JA; Helt WJ; Phillips DS; Frey RH; Noffsinger D; Larson VD; Fowler CG
    Ear Hear; 1999 Dec; 20(6):497-505. PubMed ID: 10613387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Extended High-Frequency Audiometry for Ototoxicity Monitoring: A Longitudinal Evaluation of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment.
    Stevenson LJ; Biagio-de Jager L; Graham MA; Swanepoel W
    Am J Audiol; 2023 Mar; 32(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 36490390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Short-term variability of pure-tone thresholds obtained with TDH-39P earphones.
    Flamme GA; Stephenson MR; Deiters KK; Hessenauer A; VanGessel DK; Geda K; Wyllys K; McGregor KD
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 53 Suppl 2(0 2):S5-15. PubMed ID: 24564693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Extended high-frequency bone conduction audiometry Calibration of bone conductor transducers in the conventional and extended high-frequency range.
    Rhebergen KS
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Feb; 62(2):182-191. PubMed ID: 35195500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Equivalence and test-retest reproducibility of conventional and extended-high-frequency audiometric thresholds obtained using pure-tone and narrow-band-noise stimuli.
    John AB; Kreisman BM
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Sep; 56(9):635-642. PubMed ID: 28388868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Equivalent hearing threshold levels for the Etymotic Research ER-10C otoacoustic emission probe.
    Zebian M; Hensel J; Fedtke T; Vollbort S
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jul; 51(7):564-8. PubMed ID: 22537036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
    Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Analisys of high frequency auditory thresholds in individuals aged between 18 and 29 years with no otological complaints.
    de Sá LC; de Lima MA; Tomita S; Frota SM; Santos Gde A; Garcia TR
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2007; 73(2):215-25. PubMed ID: 17589730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.