These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11324959)

  • 1. Experimental p(wall) and p(cel) correction factors for ionization chambers in low-energy clinical proton beams.
    Palmans H; Verhaegen F; Denis JM; Vynckier S; Thierens H
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Apr; 46(4):1187-204. PubMed ID: 11324959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dosimetry using plane-parallel ionization chambers in a 75 MeV clinical proton beam.
    Palmans H; Verhaegen F; Denis JM; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Aug; 47(16):2895-905. PubMed ID: 12222853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monte Carlo simulated beam quality and perturbation correction factors for ionization chambers in monoenergetic proton beams.
    Kretschmer J; Dulkys A; Brodbek L; Stelljes TS; Looe HK; Poppe B
    Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5890-5905. PubMed ID: 32989779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monte Carlo calculation of perturbation correction factors for air-filled ionization chambers in clinical proton beams using TOPAS/GEANT.
    Baumann KS; Kaupa S; Bach C; Engenhart-Cabillic R; Zink K
    Z Med Phys; 2021 May; 31(2):175-191. PubMed ID: 33775521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monte Carlo calculations of electron beam quality conversion factors for several ion chamber types.
    Muir BR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111701. PubMed ID: 25370615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monte Carlo-calculated beam quality and perturbation correction factors validated against experiments for Farmer and Markus type ionization chambers in therapeutic carbon-ion beams.
    Urago Y; Sakama M; Sakata D; Fukuda S; Katayose T; Chang W
    Phys Med Biol; 2023 Sep; 68(18):. PubMed ID: 37579752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of penh, fluka, and Geant4/topas for absorbed dose calculations in air cavities representing ionization chambers in high-energy photon and proton beams.
    Baumann KS; Horst F; Zink K; Gomà C
    Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 46(10):4639-4653. PubMed ID: 31350915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental study on the influence of the central electrode in Farmer-type ionization chambers.
    Palm A; Mattsson O
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 May; 44(5):1299-308. PubMed ID: 10368020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perturbation correction factors for the NACP-02 plane-parallel ionization chamber in water in high-energy electron beams.
    Verhaegen F; Zakikhani R; Dusautoy A; Palmans H; Bostock G; Shipley D; Seuntjens J
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(5):1221-35. PubMed ID: 16481689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monte Carlo calculations of correction factors for plastic phantoms in clinical photon and electron beam dosimetry.
    Araki F; Hanyu Y; Fukuoka M; Matsumoto K; Okumura M; Oguchi H
    Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):2992-3001. PubMed ID: 19673198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ionization chamber dosimetry of proton beams using cylindrical and plane parallel chambers. Nw versus Nk ion chamber calibrations.
    Medin J; Andreo P; Grusell E; Mattsson O; Montelius A; Roos M
    Phys Med Biol; 1995 Jul; 40(7):1161-76. PubMed ID: 7568375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental determination of
    Medin J; Andreo P; Palmans H
    Phys Med Biol; 2022 Feb; 67(5):. PubMed ID: 35081517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consistency in quality correction factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in scanned proton beam therapy.
    Sorriaux J; Testa M; Paganetti H; Bertrand D; Lee JA; Palmans H; Vynckier S; Sterpin E
    Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4919-4927. PubMed ID: 28656604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A systematic Monte Carlo study of secondary electron fluence perturbation in clinical proton beams (70-250 MeV) for cylindrical and spherical ion chambers.
    Verhaegen F; Palmans H
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2088-95. PubMed ID: 11695770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monte Carlo calculations of kQ, the beam quality conversion factor.
    Muir BR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5939-50. PubMed ID: 21158307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chamber-quality factors in 60Co for three plane-parallel chambers for the dosimetry of electrons, protons and heavier charged particles: PENELOPE Monte Carlo simulations.
    Panettieri V; Sempau J; Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(21):5917-26. PubMed ID: 18836218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perturbation correction factors for cylindrical ionization chambers in high-energy electron beams.
    Ono T; Araki F; Yoshiyama F
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2010 Jul; 3(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 20821081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gradient corrections for reference dosimetry using Farmer-type ionization chambers in single-layer scanned proton fields.
    Palmans H; Medin J; Trnková P; Vatnitsky S
    Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6531-6539. PubMed ID: 33111370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of nuclear interactions on ionization chamber perturbation factors in proton beams: FLUKA simulations supported by a Fano test.
    Lourenço A; Bouchard H; Galer S; Royle G; Palmans H
    Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):885-891. PubMed ID: 30414268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.