These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11324959)

  • 21. Proton dosimetry intercomparison based on the ICRU report 59 protocol.
    Vatnitsky S; Moyers M; Miller D; Abell G; Slater JM; Pedroni E; Coray A; Mazal A; Newhauser W; Jaekel O; Heese J; Fukumura A; Futami Y; Verhey L; Daftari I; Grusell E; Molokanov A; Bloch C
    Radiother Oncol; 1999 Jun; 51(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 10435822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study.
    Palmans H; Nafaa L; De JJ; Gillis S; Hoornaert MT; Martens C; Piessens M; Thierens H; Van der Plaetsen A; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 11848121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Monte Carlo study of correction factors for the use of plastic phantoms in clinical electron dosimetry.
    Araki F
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4368-77. PubMed ID: 18072502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparing calibration methods of electron beams using plane-parallel chambers with absorbed-dose to water based protocols.
    Stewart KJ; Seuntjens JP
    Med Phys; 2002 Mar; 29(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 11929010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. On the p(dis) correction factor for cylindrical chambers.
    Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Mar; 55(5):L9-16; author reply L17-9. PubMed ID: 20157227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
    Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Experimental investigation of the effect of air cavity size in cylindrical ionization chambers on the measurements in ⁶⁰Co radiotherapy beams.
    Swanpalmer J; Johansson KA
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Nov; 56(22):7093-107. PubMed ID: 22016264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The perturbation correction factors for cylindrical ionization chambers in high-energy photon beams.
    Yoshiyama F; Araki F; Ono T
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2010 Jul; 3(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 20821090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Electron beam water calorimetry measurements to obtain beam quality conversion factors.
    Muir BR; Cojocaru CD; McEwen MR; Ross CK
    Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5433-5444. PubMed ID: 28688120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Monte Carlo calculation of beam quality correction factors in proton beams using TOPAS/GEANT4.
    Baumann KS; Kaupa S; Bach C; Engenhart-Cabillic R; Zink K
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Mar; 65(5):055015. PubMed ID: 31962306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. On the wall perturbation correction for a parallel-plate NACP-02 chamber in clinical electron beams.
    Zink K; Wulff J
    Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):1045-54. PubMed ID: 21452742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Current best estimates of beam quality correction factors for reference dosimetry of clinical proton beams.
    Palmans H; Lourenço A; Medin J; Vatnitsky S; Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2022 Sep; 67(19):. PubMed ID: 36096096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Experimental comparison of cylindrical and plane parallel ionization chambers for reference dosimetry in continuous and pulsed scanned proton beams.
    Vilches-Freixas G; Bosmans G; Douralis A; Martens J; Meijers A; Rinaldi I; Salvo K; Thomas R; Palmans H; Lourenço A
    Phys Med Biol; 2024 May; 69(10):. PubMed ID: 38640918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Correction factors for Farmer-type chambers for absorbed dose determination in 60Co and 192Ir brachytherapy dosimetry.
    Tölli H; Johansson KA
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Nov; 43(11):3171-81. PubMed ID: 9832009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Monte Carlo study of the depth-dependent fluence perturbation in parallel-plate ionization chambers in electron beams.
    Zink K; Czarnecki D; Looe HK; von Voigts-Rhetz P; Harder D
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111707. PubMed ID: 25370621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Direct determination of k
    Krauss A; Kapsch RP
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 63(3):035041. PubMed ID: 29327693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Monte Carlo calculations for reference dosimetry of electron beams with the PTW Roos and NE2571 ion chambers.
    Muir BR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):121722. PubMed ID: 24320508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Monte Carlo calculations of beam quality correction factors kQ for electron dosimetry with a parallel-plate Roos chamber.
    Zink K; Wulff J
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(6):1595-607. PubMed ID: 18367790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. kQ factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in clinical proton beams.
    Vatnitsky SM; Siebers JV; Miller DW
    Med Phys; 1996 Jan; 23(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 8700030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. On the calibration of plane-parallel ionization chambers for electron beam dosimetry.
    Andreo P; Rodrigues LN; Lindborg L; Kraepelien T
    Phys Med Biol; 1992 May; 37(5):1147-65. PubMed ID: 1609001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.