These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11324964)

  • 21. Validating the boundary element method for forward and inverse EEG computations in the presence of a hole in the skull.
    Oostenveld R; Oostendorp TF
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 Nov; 17(3):179-92. PubMed ID: 12391571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Discontinuous Galerkin Finite Element Method for Solving the MEG and the Combined MEG/EEG Forward Problem.
    Piastra MC; Nüßing A; Vorwerk J; Bornfleth H; Oostenveld R; Engwer C; Wolters CH
    Front Neurosci; 2018; 12():30. PubMed ID: 29456487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Using reciprocity for relating the simulation of transcranial current stimulation to the EEG forward problem.
    Wagner S; Lucka F; Vorwerk J; Herrmann CS; Nolte G; Burger M; Wolters CH
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 140():163-73. PubMed ID: 27125841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Solving the forward problem in EEG source analysis by spherical and fdm head modeling: a comparative analysis - biomed 2009.
    Vatta F; Meneghini F; Esposito F; Mininel S; Di Salle F
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2009; 45():382-8. PubMed ID: 19369793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Generalized head models for MEG/EEG: boundary element method beyond nested volumes.
    Kybic J; Clerc M; Faugeras O; Keriven R; Papadopoulo T
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(5):1333-46. PubMed ID: 16481698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Review on solving the forward problem in EEG source analysis.
    Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Grech R; Muscat J; De Clercq W; Vergult A; D'Asseler Y; Camilleri KP; Fabri SG; Van Huffel S; Lemahieu I
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2007 Nov; 4():46. PubMed ID: 18053144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Realistic and spherical head modeling for EEG forward problem solution: a comparative cortex-based analysis.
    Vatta F; Meneghini F; Esposito F; Mininel S; Di Salle F
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2010; 2010():972060. PubMed ID: 20169107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Linear inverse solutions: simulations from a realistic head model in MEG.
    Soufflet L; Boeijinga PH
    Brain Topogr; 2005; 18(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 16341577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bayesian model selection of template forward models for EEG source reconstruction.
    Strobbe G; van Mierlo P; De Vos M; Mijović B; Hallez H; Van Huffel S; López JD; Vandenberghe S
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jun; 93 Pt 1():11-22. PubMed ID: 24582919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A standardized boundary element method volume conductor model.
    Fuchs M; Kastner J; Wagner M; Hawes S; Ebersole JS
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 May; 113(5):702-12. PubMed ID: 11976050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of tissue anisotropy on the EEG inverse problem.
    Cook MJ; Koles ZJ
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():4563-6. PubMed ID: 19163731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Improved forward EEG calculations using local mesh refinement of realistic head geometries.
    Yvert B; Bertrand O; Echallier JF; Pernier J
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1995 Nov; 95(5):381-92. PubMed ID: 7489667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography in a realistic geometry head model: a simulation study.
    Ding L; Lai Y; He B
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jan; 50(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 15715421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of the head model on EEG and MEG source connectivity analyses.
    Cho JH; Vorwerk J; Wolters CH; Knösche TR
    Neuroimage; 2015 Apr; 110():60-77. PubMed ID: 25638756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Use of the isolated problem approach for multi-compartment BEM models of electro-magnetic source imaging.
    Gençer NG; Akalin-Acar Z
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 50(13):3007-22. PubMed ID: 15972977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The unique determination of the primary current by MEG and EEG.
    Peng L; Cheng J; Jin L
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5565-80. PubMed ID: 17047270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
    Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
    Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A high-resolution anisotropic finite-volume head model for EEG source analysis.
    Cook MJ; Koles ZJ
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():4536-9. PubMed ID: 17947096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling.
    Wolters CH; Anwander A; Tricoche X; Weinstein D; Koch MA; MacLeod RS
    Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of multiple-sphere head models for MEG source localization.
    Lalancette M; Quraan M; Cheyne D
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Sep; 56(17):5621-35. PubMed ID: 21828900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.