These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11325119)
1. Predicting speech metrics in a simulated classroom with varied sound absorption. Bistafa SR; Bradley JS J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Apr; 109(4):1474-82. PubMed ID: 11325119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting reverberation times in a simulated classroom. Bistafa SR; Bradley JS J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Oct; 108(4):1721-31. PubMed ID: 11051499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Just noticeable differences for intensity and their relation to loudness. Johnson JH; Turner CW; Zwislocki JJ; Margolis RH J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Feb; 93(2):983-91. PubMed ID: 8445133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationships of intensity discrimination to sensation and loudness levels: dependence on sound frequency. Ozimek E; Zwislocki JJ J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Nov; 100(5):3304-20. PubMed ID: 8914312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental evaluation of radiosity for room sound-field prediction. Hodgson M; Nosal EM J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Aug; 120(2):808-19. PubMed ID: 16938969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Frequency discrimination of stylized synthetic vowels with a single formant. Lyzenga J; Horst JW J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Sep; 102(3):1755-67. PubMed ID: 9301053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Frequency discrimination of stylized synthetic vowels with two formants. Lyzenga J; Horst JW J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Nov; 104(5):2956-66. PubMed ID: 9821340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intensity just-noticeable differences at equal-loudness levels in normal and pathological ears. Stillman JA; Zwislocki JJ; Zhang M; Cefaratti LK J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jan; 93(1):425-34. PubMed ID: 8423259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement of acoustical characteristics of mosques in Saudi Arabia. Abdou AA J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1505-17. PubMed ID: 12656385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intensity discrimination determined with two paradigms in normal and hearing-impaired subjects. Turner CW; Zwislocki JJ; Filion PR J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jul; 86(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 2754103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reverberation time and maximum background-noise level for classrooms from a comparative study of speech intelligibility metrics. Bistafa SR; Bradley JS J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Feb; 107(2):861-75. PubMed ID: 10687696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of noise and occupancy on optimal reverberation times for speech intelligibility in classrooms. Hodgson M; Nosal EM J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Feb; 111(2):931-9. PubMed ID: 11863195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the combined effects of signal-to-noise ratio and room acoustics on speech intelligibility. Bradley JS; Reich RD; Norcross SG J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):1820-8. PubMed ID: 10530010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Investigating the Potential of Transparent Parallel-Arranged Micro-Perforated Panels (MPPs) as Sound Absorbers in Classrooms. Fasllija E; Yilmazer S Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(2):. PubMed ID: 36674200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech interference and transmission on residential balconies with road traffic noise. Naish DA; Tan AC; Nur Demirbilek F J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):210-26. PubMed ID: 23297896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of noise suppression on intelligibility. II: An attempt to validate physical metrics. Hilkhuysen G; Gaubitch N; Brookes M; Huckvale M J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):439-50. PubMed ID: 24437784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of acoustical conditions for speech communication in working elementary school classrooms. Sato H; Bradley JS J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2064-77. PubMed ID: 18397014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Subjective and objective speech intelligibility investigations in primary school classrooms. Astolfi A; Bottalico P; Barbato G J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):247-57. PubMed ID: 22280588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A model predicting the effect of speech of varying intelligibility on work performance. Hongisto V Indoor Air; 2005 Dec; 15(6):458-68. PubMed ID: 16268835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Forward- and backward-masked intensity discrimination measured using forced-choice and adjustment procedures. Turner CW; Horwitz AR; Souza PE J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Oct; 96(4):2121-6. PubMed ID: 7963025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]