These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11325131)

  • 1. Sensitivity to brief changes of interaural time and interaural intensity.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C; Akeroyd MA; Hartung K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Apr; 109(4):1604-15. PubMed ID: 11325131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurement of the binaural temporal window using a lateralisation task.
    Kolarik AJ; Culling JF
    Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 248(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 19111600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The variation across time of sensitivity to interaural disparities: behavioral measurements and quantitative analyses.
    Akeroyd MA; Bernstein LR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2516-26. PubMed ID: 11757941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity to interaural intensitive disparities: listeners' use of potential cues.
    Bernstein LR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jun; 115(6):3156-60. PubMed ID: 15237839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lateralization produced by interaural temporal and intensitive disparities of high-frequency, raised-sine stimuli: data and modeling.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):409-15. PubMed ID: 22280602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The contribution of static and dynamically varying ITDs and IIDs to binaural detection.
    Breebaart J; van de Par S; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Aug; 106(2):979-92. PubMed ID: 10462803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coding of temporally fluctuating interaural timing disparities in a binaural processing model based on phase differences.
    Dietz M; Ewert SD; Hohmann V; Kollmeier B
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():234-45. PubMed ID: 17949695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing monaural and interaural temporal windows: effects of a temporal fringe on sensitivity to intensity differences.
    Stellmack MA; Viemeister NF; Byrne AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Nov; 118(5):3218-28. PubMed ID: 16334901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of randomizing values of interaural disparities on binaural detection and on discrimination of interaural correlation.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Aug; 102(2 Pt 1):1113-20. PubMed ID: 9265758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing the effect of pause duration on threshold interaural time differences between exponential and squared-sine envelopes (L).
    Dietz M; Wendt T; Ewert SD; Laback B; Hohmann V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 23297875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of aging and interaural delay on the detection of a break in the interaural correlation between two sounds.
    Li L; Huang J; Wu X; Qi JG; Schneider BA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):273-86. PubMed ID: 19194287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Listeners' sensitivity to "onset/offset" and "ongoing" interaural delays in high-frequency, sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones.
    Buell TN; Griffin SJ; Bernstein LR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jan; 123(1):279-94. PubMed ID: 18177158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. No more than "slight" hearing loss and degradations in binaural processing.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Apr; 145(4):2094. PubMed ID: 31046341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lateralization of noise-burst trains based on onset and ongoing interaural delays.
    Freyman RL; Balakrishnan U; Zurek PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):320-31. PubMed ID: 20649227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrophysiological and psychophysical asymmetries in sensitivity to interaural correlation gaps and implications for binaural integration time.
    Lüddemann H; Kollmeier B; Riedel H
    Hear Res; 2016 Feb; 332():170-187. PubMed ID: 26526276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interaural correlation fails to account for detection in a classic binaural task: dynamic ITDs dominate N0Spi detection.
    van der Heijden M; Joris PX
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2010 Mar; 11(1):113-31. PubMed ID: 19760461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitivity to envelope-based interaural delays at high frequencies: center frequency affects the envelope rate-limitation.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Feb; 135(2):808-16. PubMed ID: 25234889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of interaural delay, center frequency, and no more than "slight" hearing loss on precision of binaural processing: Empirical data and quantitative modeling.
    Bernstein LR; Trahiotis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jul; 144(1):292. PubMed ID: 30075692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of static and dynamic changes in interaural correlation.
    Boehnke SE; Hall SE; Marquardt T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Oct; 112(4):1617-26. PubMed ID: 12398467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of age and interaural delay on detecting a change in interaural correlation: The role of temporal jitter.
    Wang M; Wu X; Li L; Schneider BA
    Hear Res; 2011 May; 275(1-2):139-49. PubMed ID: 21184818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.