214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11325853)
21. Replication in hydroxyurea: it's a matter of time.
Alvino GM; Collingwood D; Murphy JM; Delrow J; Brewer BJ; Raghuraman MK
Mol Cell Biol; 2007 Sep; 27(18):6396-406. PubMed ID: 17636020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Characterization of mec1 kinase-deficient mutants and of new hypomorphic mec1 alleles impairing subsets of the DNA damage response pathway.
Paciotti V; Clerici M; Scotti M; Lucchini G; Longhese MP
Mol Cell Biol; 2001 Jun; 21(12):3913-25. PubMed ID: 11359899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Adozelesin triggers DNA damage response pathways and arrests SV40 DNA replication through replication protein A inactivation.
Liu JS; Kuo SR; McHugh MM; Beerman TA; Melendy T
J Biol Chem; 2000 Jan; 275(2):1391-7. PubMed ID: 10625690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks.
Lopes M; Cotta-Ramusino C; Pellicioli A; Liberi G; Plevani P; Muzi-Falconi M; Newlon CS; Foiani M
Nature; 2001 Aug; 412(6846):557-61. PubMed ID: 11484058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Domain within the helicase subunit Mcm4 integrates multiple kinase signals to control DNA replication initiation and fork progression.
Sheu YJ; Kinney JB; Lengronne A; Pasero P; Stillman B
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 May; 111(18):E1899-908. PubMed ID: 24740181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Induction of DNA damage responses by adozelesin is S phase-specific and dependent on active replication forks.
Liu JS; Kuo SR; Beerman TA; Melendy T
Mol Cancer Ther; 2003 Jan; 2(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 12533671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A role for the spindle assembly checkpoint in the DNA damage response.
Palou R; Palou G; Quintana DG
Curr Genet; 2017 May; 63(2):275-280. PubMed ID: 27488803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Inhibition of spindle extension through the yeast S phase checkpoint is coupled to replication fork stability and the integrity of centromeric DNA.
Julius J; Peng J; McCulley A; Caridi C; Arnak R; See C; Nugent CI; Feng W; Bachant J
Mol Biol Cell; 2019 Oct; 30(22):2771-2789. PubMed ID: 31509480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Pie1, a protein interacting with Mec1, controls cell growth and checkpoint responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Wakayama T; Kondo T; Ando S; Matsumoto K; Sugimoto K
Mol Cell Biol; 2001 Feb; 21(3):755-64. PubMed ID: 11154263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Rfc5, a replication factor C component, is required for regulation of Rad53 protein kinase in the yeast checkpoint pathway.
Sugimoto K; Ando S; Shimomura T; Matsumoto K
Mol Cell Biol; 1997 Oct; 17(10):5905-14. PubMed ID: 9315648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The budding yeast Rad9 checkpoint protein is subjected to Mec1/Tel1-dependent hyperphosphorylation and interacts with Rad53 after DNA damage.
Vialard JE; Gilbert CS; Green CM; Lowndes NF
EMBO J; 1998 Oct; 17(19):5679-88. PubMed ID: 9755168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Slx4 becomes phosphorylated after DNA damage in a Mec1/Tel1-dependent manner and is required for repair of DNA alkylation damage.
Flott S; Rouse J
Biochem J; 2005 Oct; 391(Pt 2):325-33. PubMed ID: 15975089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. ATR/Mec1: coordinating fork stability and repair.
Friedel AM; Pike BL; Gasser SM
Curr Opin Cell Biol; 2009 Apr; 21(2):237-44. PubMed ID: 19230642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Mammalian Chk2 is a downstream effector of the ATM-dependent DNA damage checkpoint pathway.
Chaturvedi P; Eng WK; Zhu Y; Mattern MR; Mishra R; Hurle MR; Zhang X; Annan RS; Lu Q; Faucette LF; Scott GF; Li X; Carr SA; Johnson RK; Winkler JD; Zhou BB
Oncogene; 1999 Jul; 18(28):4047-54. PubMed ID: 10435585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae Chk1p in the response to replication blocks.
Schollaert KL; Poisson JM; Searle JS; Schwanekamp JA; Tomlinson CR; Sanchez Y
Mol Biol Cell; 2004 Sep; 15(9):4051-63. PubMed ID: 15229282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Association of RPA with chromosomal replication origins requires an Mcm protein, and is regulated by Rad53, and cyclin- and Dbf4-dependent kinases.
Tanaka T; Nasmyth K
EMBO J; 1998 Sep; 17(17):5182-91. PubMed ID: 9724654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Replisome instability, fork collapse, and gross chromosomal rearrangements arise synergistically from Mec1 kinase and RecQ helicase mutations.
Cobb JA; Schleker T; Rojas V; Bjergbaek L; Tercero JA; Gasser SM
Genes Dev; 2005 Dec; 19(24):3055-69. PubMed ID: 16357221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Genome-wide replication profiles of S-phase checkpoint mutants reveal fragile sites in yeast.
Raveendranathan M; Chattopadhyay S; Bolon YT; Haworth J; Clarke DJ; Bielinsky AK
EMBO J; 2006 Aug; 25(15):3627-39. PubMed ID: 16888628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The level of origin firing inversely affects the rate of replication fork progression.
Zhong Y; Nellimoottil T; Peace JM; Knott SR; Villwock SK; Yee JM; Jancuska JM; Rege S; Tecklenburg M; Sclafani RA; Tavaré S; Aparicio OM
J Cell Biol; 2013 Apr; 201(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 23629964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The S-phase checkpoint: targeting the replication fork.
Segurado M; Tercero JA
Biol Cell; 2009 Aug; 101(11):617-27. PubMed ID: 19686094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
