These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11326507)

  • 1. Effect of camera angulation on adaptation of CAD/CAM restorations.
    Parsell DE; Anderson BC; Livingston HM; Rudd JI; Tankersley JD
    J Esthet Dent; 2000; 12(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 11326507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Margin gap size of ceramic inlays using second-generation CAD/CAM equipment.
    Sturdevant JR; Bayne SC; Heymann HO
    J Esthet Dent; 1999; 11(4):206-14. PubMed ID: 10825877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The optical Cerec impression--electronic model production.
    Wiedhahn K
    Int J Comput Dent; 1998 Sep; 1(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 11351459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of different methods of optical impression making on the marginal gap of onlays created with CEREC 3D.
    da Costa JB; Pelogia F; Hagedorn B; Ferracane JL
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 20533633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
    Schaefer O; Decker M; Wittstock F; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dental CAD/CAM technologies: the optical impression (II).
    Pfeiffer J
    Int J Comput Dent; 1999 Jan; 2(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 11351452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of different convergence angles and tooth preparation heights on the internal adaptation of Cerec crowns.
    Mou SH; Chai T; Wang JS; Shiau YY
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Mar; 87(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 11941350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal adaptation of CAD-CAM onlays: Influence of preparation design and impression technique.
    Lima FF; Neto CF; Rubo JH; Santos GC; Moraes Coelho Santos MJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 29551386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-Dimensional Digital Evaluation of the Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated from Different CAD/CAM Materials.
    Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e504-e509. PubMed ID: 29508488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dental CAD/CAM technologies: the optical impression (I).
    Pfeiffer J
    Int J Comput Dent; 1998 Sep; 1(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 11351456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of Different CAM Strategies on the Fit of Partial Crown Restorations: A Digital Three-dimensional Evaluation.
    Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(5):530-538. PubMed ID: 29630483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of marginal fit between CAD-CAM and hot-press lithium disilicate crowns.
    Dolev E; Bitterman Y; Meirowitz A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):124-128. PubMed ID: 29961628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated composite resin and ceramic crowns scanned by 2 intraoral cameras.
    de Paula Silveira AC; Chaves SB; Hilgert LA; Ribeiro AP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 27677214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Effect of camera control devices of Cerec 2 on the fit of CAD/CAM all-ceramic copyings of posterior tooth].
    Chen Y; Li H; Zhao YF; Liang X
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Jun; 23(3):247-50. PubMed ID: 16078470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of Crystallization Firing on Marginal Gap of CAD/CAM Fabricated Lithium Disilicate Crowns.
    Gold SA; Ferracane JL; da Costa J
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Jan; 27(1):63-66. PubMed ID: 28514042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of CNC-milling on the marginal and internal fit of dental ceramics: a pilot study.
    Schaefer O; Kuepper H; Thompson GA; Cachovan G; Hefti AF; Guentsch A
    Dent Mater; 2013 Aug; 29(8):851-8. PubMed ID: 23743092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparisons of fit of CAD-CAM restorations using three imaging surfaces.
    Hembree JH
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb; 26(2):145-7. PubMed ID: 7568725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
    Akbar JH; Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K; Eick JD
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
    Ahrberg D; Lauer HC; Ahrberg M; Weigl P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.